Posts Tagged ‘Feminism’

Hot and Sexy Communist GirlWhat are the origins of feminism and its aim? Equal rights, or the destruction of Western society? 

________________________________________

“If the term “radical feminism” (a.k.a. Marxist- or socialist-feminism) is somewhat new to you, you need to expand your knowledge. After all, radical feminism, the currently controlling faction of feminism, governs just about everything that is happening in your life.” — Carey Roberts, author: Marxism and the Roots of Radical Feminism

________________________________________

“Rape is an expression of … male supremacy … the age-old economic, political and cultural exploitation of women by men.” Does this sound like a modern radical feminist? Guess again. It is from an American Communist Party pamphlet from 1948 entitled Woman Against Myth  by Mary Inman.

In a 2002 book, Red Feminism: American Communism and the Making of Women’s Liberation, feminist historian Kate Weigand states: “…ideas, activists and traditions that emanated from the Communist movement of the forties and fifties continued to shape the direction of the new women’s movement of the 1960s and later.”(154)

In fact, Weigand, a lecturer at Smith College, shows that modern feminism is a direct outgrowth of American Communism. There is nothing that feminists said or did in the 1960’s-1980’s that wasn’t prefigured in the CPUSA of the 1940’s and 1950’s. Many second-wave feminist leaders were “red diaper babies,” the children of Communists.

Communists pioneered the political and cultural analysis of woman’s oppression. They originated “women’s studies,” and advocated public daycare, birth control, abortion and even children’s rights. They forged key feminist concepts such as “the personal is the political” and techniques such as “consciousness raising.”

________________________________________

Hot and Sexy Nude Communist Lesbian Girls

Since your Grandma was in diapers, the socialists have been recruiting American women and girls to aid — unwittingly or otherwise — in their unrelenting attack on the very fabric of our society…  

________________________________________

In the late 1940’s, CPUSA leaders realized that the labor movement was becoming increasingly hostile to Communism. They began to focus on women and African Americans. They hoped “male supremacy” would “bring more women into the organization and into the fight against the domestic policies of the Cold War.” (80)

Communist women who made up 40% of the party wanted more freedom to attend party meetings. After the publication of Women Against Myth  in 1948, the CPUSA initiated a process of “re-educating” men that we recognize only too well today.

For example, in the party newspaper The Daily Worker a photo caption of a man with a young child read, “Families are stronger and happier if the father knows how to fix the cereal, tie the bibs and take care of the youngsters.” (127)

The Party ordered men who didn’t take the woman question seriously to complete “control tasks involving study on the woman question.” In 1954 the Los Angeles branch disciplined men for “hogging discussion at club meetings, bypassing women comrades in leadership and making sex jokes degrading to women.” (94)

A film Salt of the Earth, which critic Pauline Kael called “Communist propaganda”, portrayed women taking a decisive role in their husbands’ labor strike. “Against her husband’s wishes, Esperanza became a leader in the strike and for the first time forged a role for herself outside of her household… [her] political successes persuaded Ramon to accept a new model of family life.” (132) Portrayals of strong assertive successful women became as common in the Communist press and schools, as they are in the mass media today.

Communist women formalized a sophisticated Marxist analysis of the “woman question.” The books In Women’s Defense (1940) by Mary Inman, Century of Struggle (1954) by Eleanor Flexner and The Unfinished Revolution (1962) by Eve Merriam recorded women’s oppression and decried sexism in mass culture and language. For example, Mary Inman argued that “manufactured femininity” and “overemphasis on beauty” keeps women in subjection (33).

The founder of modern feminism, Betty Frieden, relied on these texts when she wrote The Feminine Mystique (1963). These women all hid the fact that they were long-time Communist activists. In the 1960, their daughters had everything they needed, including the example of subterfuge, to start the Women’s Liberation Movement.

________________________________________

The Truth About Feminism

Courageous thinking women of all stripes are coming out against the feminist agenda, recognizing it clearly for what it is: a fascist ploy designed to foment civil unrest through gender tension and inevitable conflict, help bring about the destruction of the traditional American family unit, and achieve significant population reduction through means of biological attrition 

________________________________________

The Communist Character of Feminism

Feminism’s roots in Marxist Communism explain a great deal about this curious but dangerous movement. It explains:

Why the “woman’s movement” hates femininity and imposes a political-economic concept like “equality” on a personal, biological and mystical relationship.

Why the “women’s movement” also embraces equality of race and class.

Why they want revolution (“transformation”) and have a messianic vision of a gender-less utopia.

Why they believe human nature is infinitely malleable and can be shaped by indoctrination and coercion.

Why they engage in endless, mind-numbing theorizing, doctrinal disputes and factionalism.

Why truth for them is a “social construct” defined by whomever has power, and appearances are more important than reality.

Why they reject God, nature and scientific evidence in favour of their political agenda.

Why they refuse to debate, don’t believe in free speech, and suppress dissenting views.

Why they behave like a quasi-religious cult, or like the Red Guard.

________________________________________

Feminist Prefer Dildoes Over Men

The socialist/feminist agenda promotes the rapidly-growing perception of men as material and the objects of fear and loathing… inept, inconsequential, and inferior by the very nature of their gender assignment… 

________________________________________

It is hard to escape the conclusion that feminism is Communism by another name. Communism is designed to give power to the puppets of central bankers by fostering division and conflict. Divide and Conquer. Having failed to peddle class and race war, Communism promoted gender conflict instead. In each case they fostered a sense of grievance in the target group. Now the traditional feminine role is that of “oppressed” women.

The “diversity” and “multicultural” movements represent Communism’s attempt to empower and use other minorities, gays and “people of color,” to further undermine the majority (European, Christian) culture. Thus, the original CPUSA trio of “race, gender and class” is very much intact but class conflict was never a big seller.

The term “politically correct” originated in the Russian Communist Party in the 1920’s. Its usage in America today illustrates the extent society has been subverted. Feminist activists are mostly Communist dupes. The Communist goal is to destroy Western Civilization and establish a veiled dictatorship called “world government” run by the toadies of the central bankers.

We have seen this destruction in the dismantling of the liberal arts curriculum and tradition of free speech and inquiry at our universities. We have seen this virus spread to government, business, the media and the military. This could only happen because the financial elite in fact sponsors Communism.

In Communism, government is the ultimate monopoly. It controls everything, not just wealth but also power and thought. It is the instrument of monopoly capital (i.e. Rothschild, Rockefeller). Everybody from the President on down works for them.

________________________________________

The New American Family

 Are we looking at the new paradigm for the American family unit? We can assume it’s a girl, although somebody’s gotta work in the coal mine… while Mommy and Mommy wine, dine, and do the sixty-nine… and soak up the almost nirvanic ambience of their male-free “Girltopia”..  

 ________________________________________

A Local Example

“Political correctness” has dulled and regimented our cultural life. In 2002, here in Winnipeg, Betty Granger, a conservative school trustee referred to house price increases in Vancouver caused by “the Asian invasion.” Granger was pilloried mercilessly in the press. People sent hate letters and dumped garbage on her lawn.

At a meeting, the School Board Chairman acknowledged that Granger is not a racist. He acknowledged that Asians actually have married into her family. Nonetheless, Granger was censured because, and I quote, “appearances are more important than reality.” This slippage from the mooring of objective truth is the hallmark of Communism.

The atmosphere at the meeting was charged. Mild mannered Canadians, all champions of “tolerance,” behaved like wild dogs eager to rip apart a wounded rabbit. Betty Granger repented  and voted in favor of her own censure.

________________________________________

Passing Feminism onto Children

Replicating the virus: it takes only a single generation for handlers to “own” a given population

________________________________________

These rituals of denunciation and contrition, typical of Stalinist Russia or Maoist China, are becoming more common in America. They are like show trials designed to frighten people into conforming. We have “diversity officers” and “human rights commissions” and “sensitivity training” to uphold feminist shibboleths. They talk about “discrimination” but they freely discriminate against Christians, white heterosexual men and traditional women. They use the spectre of “sexual harassment” to fetter male-female relations and purge their opponents.

In 1980, three women in Leningrad produced 10 typewritten copies of a feminist magazine called Almanac. The KGB shut down the magazine and deported the women to West Germany. In the USSR, feminism has largely been for export. According to Professor Weigand, her “book provides evidence to support the belief that at least some Communists regarded the subversion of the gender system [in America] as an integral part of the larger fight to overturn capitalism.” (6)

In conclusion, the feminist pursuit of “equal rights” is a mask for an insidious Communist agenda. The Communist MO has always been deception, infiltration and subversion using social justice issues as a pretext. Communism can take any form that empowers the puppets of the central bankers. The goal is the destruction of Western civilization and creation of a new world order run by monopoly capital. This has largely been accomplished.

Kate Weigand’s Red Feminism demonstrates that the Communist agenda is alive and well and living under an assumed name.

________________________________________

Topless Teen Lesbians Drinking at Beach Party

Where the boys aren’t… living it up in a socialist/feminist-inspired “Girltopia” ________________________________________

Special thanks to Henry Makow, located at:

http://www.savethemales.ca

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982.

________________________________________

And this, from John Riddell. His working paper, The Communist Women’s Movement (1921-26) is available at: www.johnriddell.wordpress.com.

His analysis is the first English-language study of the world Communist women’s organization launched by Clara Zetkin with Lenin’s active support, and concludes as follows:

“The Communist women stood for the consistent pursuit of militant unity of the workers’ movement. They sought to unite women from all social layers who were prepared to actively oppose the evils of capitalism. They favoured an adroit search for common ground with non-Communist currents among women and in the labour movement. In doing so, they played a significant role in shaping the leadership of the Communist International  as a whole.

“This is perhaps their most important legacy to us. The Communist Women’s International  prefigures the leading role of women in movements for social progress both today and tomorrow.”

________________________________________

Teen Lesbian Tongue Kiss

The current ubiquitous nature of images such as this one, taken from a popular feminist website, make it difficult for the casual observer to distinguish authentic feminism from simple homosexuality  

________________________________________

We’ve reached the point now where the feminist/fascist agenda has left no sacred cows unpolluted

________________________________________

The Vatican orthodoxy watchdog announced a full-scale overhaul of the largest umbrella group for nuns in the United States today, accusing the group of taking positions that undermine Roman Catholic teaching on the priesthood and homosexuality while promoting “certain radical feminist themes incompatible with the Catholic faith.”

An American archbishop was appointed to oversee reform of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, which will include rewriting the group’s statutes, reviewing all its plans and programs — including approving speakers — and ensuring the organization properly follows Catholic prayer and ritual.

The Leadership Conference, based in Silver Spring, Md., represents about 57,000 religious sisters and offers programs ranging from leadership training for women’s religious orders to advocacy on social justice issues. Representatives of the Leadership Conference did not respond to requests for comment.

The report from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith released today paints a scathing portrait of the Leadership Conference of Women’s Religious as consistently violating Catholic teaching. The report went on to say that the organization faced a “grave” doctrinal crisis, in which issues of “crucial importance” to the church, such as abortion and euthanasia, have been ignored.

Vatican officials also castigated the group for making some public statements that “disagree with or challenge positions taken by the bishops,” who are the church’s authentic teachers of faith and morals.”

Investigators cited a speech by Sister Laurie Brink at an annual assembly that argued that religious sisters were “`moving beyond the church’ or even beyond Jesus.” Brink is a professor at the Catholic Theological Union in Chicago.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith said the Leadership Conference had submitted letters that suggest that sisters in leadership teams “collectively take a position not in agreement with the church’s teaching on human sexuality.”

In programs and presentations, investigators noted “a prevalence of certain radical feminist themes incompatible with the Catholic faith.”

Church officials said the reform would include a review of ties between the Leadership Conference and NETWORK, a Catholic social justice lobby. NETWORK played a key role in supporting the Obama administration’s health care overhaul despite the bishops’ objections that the bill would provide government funding for abortion. The Leadership Conference disagreed with the bishops’ analysis of the law and also supported President Obama’s plan.

***************

Special thanks to The Associated Press, located at:  http://hosted.ap.org

________________________________________

Its now trendy and cute for our college-age daughters to have sex with each other

________________________________________

“There are so many people today that don’t think of themselves as feminists, they don’t even use that term. But their lives have been a direct result of the feminist culture… and the influence of feminism on their life, often without even knowing it.”  — Suzanne Venker, author of The Flipside of Feminism

***************

“Feminism, by grounding itself in the philosophy of Hegel and Marx, is condemning women to a new servitude: slavery to the state.” — Larry Anderson, writer and philosopher

***************

“Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism” — Catharine MacKinnon

_________________________________________

I’ve spent the last decade devoting myself heart, mind, body, and soul to three different middle-aged American women. The first one was my age — now 52. The second one was a decade older — now 62 — and the third and latest one was 15 years younger than me. and is now 38, having had a birthday in the interim. All three were American-born and raised.

Third time’s a charm. I don’t want another one. I’m cured.

After the last three back-to-back, whose ages spanned a 25-year range and who perceivably had nothing in common with each other whatsoever, I’ve decided to become a “confirmed batchelor”, either for the duration, or until I can find someone from somewhere else — outside of the country — where their women have not been corrupted irrevocably and irreparably by the insidious subversive programming our women have been plagued with and subjected to unceasingly over the last couple of generations — a feminist agenda.

***************

The Big Picture 

Right now your puppetmasters want two things and two things only:

1)  Total control, over YOU.

2)  Far less of YOU to control.

Your puppetmasters want you in an early grave.  If you could drop dead somewhere between 50 and 60 it would be mightily convenient. For a number of essential reasons, chief among them:

1)  They don’t have to pay you back all the money you’ve paid into Social Security all your life — they get to keep it!

2)  By the time you get up around 40-50 you’ve started wising up, and seeing through The Matrix. Up until then, everything’s pretty much revolved around that thing between your legs and holding down a steady job.

3)  At around 50 your “battery power” has dropped to around 50 percent — the point of diminishing returns. You’re producing less and less, while you’re requiring more and more maintenance. You’re no longer “cost-effective” to the state, and it’s time to start looking at replacement.

4)  The “powers that be” seriously  want to bring about a population reduction. Not just a cessation of any further population growth, but less people — up to 80 percent less, by some estimates. Yeah. So, they just need some people to start going away period. They’re not that particular who they are. If you’re warm and breathing you qualify.

***************

People, you need to wrap your heads around the fact that the truth of your condition is this: evil men you don’t even know exist are guiding your lives and you don’t even know it. Precisely where you are at today is the result of a whole lot of third-party intervention and manipulation you weren’t even aware was taking place around you.

But now we have the opportunity to become aware, and take a fresh and candid, objective (hopefully) look at some of these crucial issues affecting all of us equally today, and in a purely negative, destructive way I might add. You can’t correct a problem you don’t know exists or can’t get to the bottom of, can’t define. But once we bring the problem out into the light we can explore it and examine it and then come to some sensible conclusions.

First watch this short video so you can get a quick peek at just a part of what lies behind the Matrix  concerning these feminist issues. You’ll be amazed and glad you did…

________________________________________

________________________________________

This is a classic example of how crucial, sweeping, life-altering  changes in national culture and direction can be planned, set in motion and executed by just a handful of privileged men — and women — at the very top levels of power and control, travelling on an agenda that has their best interests in mind and not ours.

This is how you are being controlled, and brainwashed, and manipulated, and exploited every day of your life by a few evil men at the top of the food chain that want what’s worst for you. They want to strip you of your essential connections and primary ties, inhibit your personal growth and development, and make you a totally dependent model drone they can control completely.

And they want to stop you from having babies if they can: through surreptitious chemical sterilization and subversive feminist programming. What babies do slip through under the wire they want to separate from you as quickly as possible so that they may be indoctrinated in the doctrine and the dogma of the state at as early and impressionable an age as possible. They’ve managed to whittle this process down from age 5 back in my day, to age 3 currently, and I think it’s just ridiculous.

But I envision a time in the-not-too distant future when the state will simply take the babies from their mothers in the delivery room, then you can basically kiss their whiny little narrow behinds good-bye. This is every fascist’s ultimate wet dream; the parents totally eliminated from the process of raising the child.

________________________________________

________________________________________

On the flip side of the feminism equation, think of all the mateless, unloved, and frustrated males spawned by this feminist process, who then just happen to fall into the profile of those the fascist state values most highly: baton swingers and cannon fodder — bereft of primary ties, individualized, with freedom an “unbearable burden” and something best escaped from, into the welcome arms of the state — the army, the secret police, the detention camp staff, etc. Here, we’ll fill the hole, fill the vacuum: take this uniform, we’ll give you a family, an identity. Here, take this machine gun, we’ll give your life purpose, direction…

I keep coming back to this because this is what it’s all about, every bit of this — everything. The corporate state controlling you and every facet of your life — completely.  And about just how “under control” you really are even now, as we speak. If you only knew how many of your most crucial decisions were either actually made for you, manipulated or skewed by external programming and intervention, you’d come unglued.

***************

Where the Boys Aren’t

About ten years ago they started phasing lesbian sexual influence into everything from print ads to Hollywood movies. In an ever-intensifying “in your face” kind of way, phasing it in and ratcheting it up by degrees. Within that decade every historical girl-girl first was made: the first girl-girl kiss on network TV, the first girl-girl romantic leads in a major Hollywood film, the first lesbian TV show, whatever. Then came the obligatory girl-girl sex scene stuck in the middle of every film, it seemed like, whether it belonged there or not, Then came an all-out mainstream media blitz, until by time the smoke cleared, it was everywhere you looked, interwoved into everything: sometimes subtly, usually not so subtly.

Social engineering through subversive programming.

Now, about eight years into that process, I’ve got my 20 year-old stepdaughter confessing to me that, after her dorm room mate at the college she had gone away to study at and her get done with their homework assignments each night, they unwind by smoking pot and engaging in sex with each other.

That will stick in my head ’til the day I die.

________________________________________

________________________________________

Media-Fueled Social Engineering For Dummies

This, from GizmoDiva:

Remember the famous public lip lock between Madonna and Britney? Well, the effects of such celebrity lip locks are not just limited to creating media frenzy and publicity. These lip locks have apparently started off a new trend among young middle class girls who think it’s fashionable to kiss each other. More and more young girls are imitating and experimenting with their sexuality to be like their favorite celebs. This social trend of faux lesbianism has become so common and popular that it is now commonly recognized as LUGs, or Lesbian until Graduation! It is definitely alarming and disturbing to see young girls trying to act like lipstick lesbians. When asked the reason behind such behavior, one girl replied, “Much of it is to do with impressing boys, and some of it is just showing off, but also that there is an element of imitating female celebrities.”

***************

This stunt, pulled off by what were arguably the two biggest and most influential female names in the business, the accompanying media frenzy, and all the supportive environmental programming did what it was intended to do: put a whole generation of females in each other’s arms, lips locked, tongues tango-ing.

Introduce role models, exhibit preferred behavior (stimulous) — monkey see, monkey do (response). This progamming is called conditioning, or associative learning.  It won’t stick to all of them but it’ll stick to some, and the corruption will spread from there… and act to foster the transfer of the breeding-age female’s sexual interest away from the male and onto other breeding-age females.

And even within the ones it doesn’t stick to initially it can plant seeds of dissention that can germinate down the road and act to destroy a viable male-female love relation or family unit.

***************

Let’s say this particular programming venture had managed to achieve a 100% success rate, and a whole entire generation of 100% vagina-worshipping, “girl-power” chanting, card-carrying lesbians was successfully created. Where the hell are we going to go from there? You tell me. I’m particularly concerned, considering I’m one of the 3 -4 billion horny guys left out in the cold, frustrated and pissed off. And about that time, I’m sure I’ll be looking at the average female as an object of contempt, and now looking suspiciously like “the enemy”. What are the only viable options left me now? Celibacy, rape or homosexuality. I don’t particularly like the sound of any of them…

________________________________________

________________________________________

Have You Been Programmed to Fail?

________________________________________

________________________________________

Yes I Take It Personally

I really do. And the primary reason why is it affects me personally.  Because it’s thrust in my face now everywhere I go. The current emasculation of, attack on, and just general blatent disregard for the male. It’s very real as far as I’m concerned, and I feel it’s effects every day. The pervasive subversion of the feminist agenda. Real men are stuck on the butt end of all this, and I am one. And it’s caused some very real and catastrophic consequences in some of my intimate personal relationships along the way.

I think that there’s never been a worse time in history to be a male, I feel like I’m discriminated against and disrespected all the time, for both my age and my gender, and sometimes my race too, in a myriad of little insidious ways that serve to attack my self-esteem and might easily leave me feeling “less than”.

This in turn, tends to skew my own attitude toward women in a general negative direction — where I don’t want it to go, and where it shouldn’t be.

Where my wrath should be appropriately focused is on the programmers and the programming. The women affected by it are simply victims, same as me and all the other men.

All this is covered in the videos below…

________________________________________

You’ll Know a Junior Feminazi is Sleeping Next to You When:

1)  “Dominate or Terminate” sums up her whole relational approach.

2)  She finds a way to see you as inferior, no matter what it takes.

3)  Suddenly one day you’ll think of  her as a “Princess” — and you’ll never stop.

4)  You discover she might like sexy young big-breasted webcam models even more than you do.

5)  She tells you she’s finally found her soulmate: and it’s not you, but her BFF.

6)  If she’s not humping you, she’s dumping you.

  ________________________________________

Trending Now…

“All across America young single women are cutting ties with their Craigslist roommates and taking out a lease of their own… and experiencing the joys of flying solo!” — MSNBC headline homepage news article

When my homepage popped up the morning after Valentine’s Day, this is what I found staring me in the face, along with a stock photograph of an attractive 30-something female, obviously home alone in nice digs and having the time of her life.

This is literally thrust in my face, I cannot avoid it, My subconscious mind has absorbed it already, taking in every detail and filing it away who knows where, to be used later on who knows how.

I’ve just been successfully programmed, whether I like it or not…

***************

Anatomy of a Brainwashing Ploy

Let’s break this apart and take a closer look at how it works…

First off, I look at the MSNBC homepage as a tremendous real-time resource of what the global elite wants to program into somebody’s head, right now — whether it be the women, the children, whoever, or just the public at large. It’s an NWO propaganda machine.

I’d been wondering where Bill Gates was hiding throughout all this, but it seems like he’s finally come out: for vaccines and population reduction. That’s all I needed to hear.

Well Bill, if you really think the population needs to be reduced, why don’t you go first and lead us by example. We’ll follow you… ; )

***************

Now on to the programming ploy… Oh, I meant “news article”… sorry…

First off this programming effort wasn’t aimed at me. The target demographic is “young single women”.

So this is who the NWO are out to influence, right now: younger, single, females — the “dating pool”,  the “baby-makers”, the “breeders”. A little deeper investigation revealed that this particular piece was only the tip of the iceberg, part of a larger on-going effort that’s been on the front burner for awhile now.

Okay, we’re out to reach them. What do we want them to do:

1)  Cut their primary ties to their existing emotional and financial support mechanisms (See Fromm).

2)  “Individualize” themselves through increasing social isolation and emotional detachment. This is how a fascist drone, totally dependent on the state for all things large and small, is created (See Fromm).

3)  Live alone.

Why do we want them to live alone? See numbers one and two. That’s why.

***************

It amazes me that this is what it always comes back to — and it always does: the stripping of the free and sovereign individual of everything that makes them and keeps them strong and happy and joyous and free;  of everything good, and right, and loving, and meaningful, and lasting, in order to create a vacuum in you that draws you to them inexorably… that makes your very freedom seem an unbearable burden, something better escaped from, into the loving tentacles of the fascist state. To be absorbed

This is how all evil organizations are created: from street gangs, to entire fascist nations with populations of hundreds of millions: break down the family, sever the primary ties, isolate and individualize the individual, absorb her into the fold.

***************

Our female dating pool is now actively being encouraged to cut their primary ties, and in the real world this translates into far more than simply “letting go their Craigslist roommates”. Friends, lovers, and who knows who are getting caught in the crossfire as well, as our female breeding stock just suddenly packs up and trots out the door, to march off like lemmings to the sea and vacant apartments of their own. To isolate themselves off in their own corner alone…

No, I forgot: “to experience all the joys of flying solo!” 

This thing runs deep, it’s a significant and growing problem, with more gas thrown on the fire every day by the NWO social programmers.

***************

There are actually a myriad of advantages to the NWO to have this happen: it helps reduce the population, it funnels more money into the corporate state, as you now have another whole separate rent bill, cable bill, water bill, electric bill, all that.

Every adult in the country living alone in separate residences would be the corporate state’s ultimate wet dream come true, as there would be a separate billing account and monthly payment to bank on for every single individual for every single essential service, from monthly rent to internet service. They get to fill double the amount of apartment and condo vacancies, all that.

If you watched the Aaron Russo clip you will see how these people think. They think like this I just outlined. First and foremost they are “businessmen” — more or less. They run mega-corporations. They run central banks, world banks  and even governments. They do not play. They thrive on cash and enough is never enough. They’re into “zeros” man, and to them you’re looking like one.

They own the garbage collection service she’ll have to now pay for monthly. They own the utility companies, the cable companies, the ISP companies, and all the companies this person “cutting ties” and flying solo” will now have to establish a separate billing account with and pay for separately.  They own the cheap flat she’ll live in and the strip mall she’ll shop at. Their only interest is her complete and total exploitation.

So yeah, if they can just take any two or more people who are sharing accomodations together for any reason whatsoever, and split them up into separate households for each… oh man would they ever be ecstatic! A whole new mailbox to send a whole new crop of monthly bills to every thirty days.

So now they’ve gone from forcing the woman out of the house and into the workplace through the phony “women’s lib” ploy, in order to double the tax base, to forcing her out of the home entirely, and to pay for everything herself ; to foot all the bills entirely, with no assistance from anyone, with the exception of the corporate state.

She’s now a total dependent. A completely autonomous, individualized, producing, consuming, biological tax-paying organism. She’s been liberated! She’s…

Free!

________________________________________

Let’s go back to the programming piece: the image may be the most important element, weighed against the whole body of text. The viewer may not even read the article, But the image is what is thrust straight into the face involuntarily and left enblazoned onto the subconscious mind. So let’s look at that…

________________________________________

Images of Single Young Women Home Alone We’re Shown

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

Images of Single Young Women Home Alone We’re Not Shown

________________________________________

 ________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

So we are progammed to associate being young, single and female and living alone with bright, pleasant upscale surroundings, having a blast just sitting around doing nothing, being secure and “in charge”, and deriving the greatest enjoyment from the lowliest of mundane chores.

But the truth is everything’s more special when you have someone special to share it with. And the typical condition of the typical young single when typically home alone in reality is actually this:

1)  Lonely

2)  Horny

3)  Bored

And sometimes, even:

4)  Depressed

________________________________________

The All-Essential Buzz-Term

So now we need a tag line to go with the pic, because that’s what’s going to get lodged in the brain along with the visual. It needs to be something brief, catchy, and repeatable. In this case: “flying solo”, “the joy of flying solo”, or “experiencing the joys of flying solo”. I like the middle one: “the joy of flying solo”.

I wrote ads for a living for a couple of years (amongst other things), so, I have got to tell you this masterstroke flying solo thing has me wanting to bow down to its inventor and worship him or her as my personal marketing guru. It’s sheer genius. You’re not “living alone”, that sounds much too dull and even a little risky, if you stop to think about it, and you may…

You’re Flying Solo!

I love this because it genuinely cracks me up every time I go over it again! Really, every single time…

So, not living alone: lonely, horny and bored, vulnerable to intruders, having to foot every bill yourself, perform every tedious and nasty chore yourself, and just kind of generally going through life as the perennial third wheel and wishing you had someone special to give you backrubs and foot massages and cuddle and snuggle with and you know it gets way better, but:

Experiencing …

Joy …

Flying …

Solo!!!

I don’t have the article in front of me but I can guarantee you the phrase “living alone” never appears in it once. Because no one in their right mind wants to live alone. Everyone wants and needs someone.

But “flying solo!” — now that does  sound like fun!

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________