Posts Tagged ‘Cancer’

Did this man naturally get sick and die, or was the process intentional?


“Most don’t see… most who see don’t care… most who care do nothing. This is the formula for enslavement.” — John Dilligent


“I believe that God put me on this Earth to be the best person I could be, and put everybody on this Earth to be the best that they could be. You have to stand up for what’s right in life. Unless you do that… you’re nothing.” — Aaron Russo


Before Aaron Russo died of bladder cancer in August of 2007, he confided to Alex Jones in an interview that he suspected a cancer-causing agent had been intentionally and covertly introduced into his system in an effort to eliminate him from the picture, if only by degrees leading to a premature demise. In the end, even he wasn’t sure, which is only one reason why elimination by this means is so insidiously effective. Let’s face it: if I shoot you, I’m going to know I shot you, you’re going to know I shot you, and everybody else that examines your dead body is going to know I shot you, too.  That you’ve been murdered.

But in the instance of “assassination by carcinogen”, not even the victim can be sure he’s been victimized, nor can anyone else, including the coroner or forensic medical examiner. The inevitable ruling is death by natural causes, so in the absence of  a legal ruling of death by homicide you can have no suspects. Not to mention the completely demoralizing task of trying to establish when, where and how the poisoning was actually committed, for what motive, and who was directly and indirectly involved… the rational mind of the typical homicide investigator would take one look at this scenario, and fire back immediately, “Completely unsolvable by its very nature”

The perfect crime. It’s just a little slow-acting, like spraying a weed with Round-Up rather than simply pulling it. Some weeds we can afford to take more time with.

But what most people who question both the value and the validity of this increasingly popular extermination practice may fail to consider, however, it that once that compound is delivered into the bloodstream and begins to work it’s magic, which actually happens almost instantly, the host system begins to immediately react. The die is now cast, the result inevitable: the unwitting and hapless victim will soon wither away and die.

Aaron was visibly healthy and robust at the time of the incident, so with him it took longer than it may have with other victims already in a poor state of health for whatever pre-existing reason. But the incident effectively morphed him from a man locked into a life and death struggle with the Illuminati to a man locked into a life and death struggle with terminal cancer. See the instant advantages here?  Most of the wind was taken out of his sails almost immediately, as the disease rendered him weakened, fearful and preoccupied, I’m sure. That’s all they need. Then the next time you look up, he’s gone…

Was he murdered? Who can say. Even he didn’t know for sure. But I tend to lend his God-given intuition proper credence, and if you establish a simple timeline of this incident I feel it’s an odd coincidence it begins in 2001, the same year of the belated implementation of the Operation Northwoods masterplan and the extermination of Bill Cooper by more traditional and less exotic means.

I instinctively like and trust this guy. I trust him insofar as I believe in his essential sincerity. What he’s saying — or better put everything  he’s saying — may not be the truth, but I’m convinced he’s telling the truth as he knows it, and it’s coming straight from the heart. I believe that it was only that he really cared about the rest of us in a way that truly too few do, that he was driven to do what he did. And in keeping with resident evil, it probably did cost him his life — or at least an undetermined portion of it. He may have had another good 20 years left in him. Think of all he might of accomplished in that span given the track he was on, the circles he freely traveled in, and the publicity he was getting. Not to mention his innate drive and determination. See now how all this works? He’s no longer a threat today, no longer a nuisance, a fly in the ointment. He’s in a hole in the ground, in a box, and he ain’t coming out anytime soon.

In the end, while he may not have given up his life for us, he did dedicate his life to us. So I dedicate this post to him just to throw in my little bit, in the hopes of helping to keep his memory and his work alive… and thus him too, in a sense…







What Do We Know About This Case?

Despite rumors to the contrary, we know that there is  a Nick Rockefeller, that he is a member of the  Rockefeller family, that he lists his occupation as a practicing California attorney, that he involves himself in educational affairs both nationally and internationally, stressing a globalist approach to education, that he is listed on the CFR’s membership roster for 2010 along with four other members of the Rockefeller family, and that he has been active in Chinese business and educational affairs, jet-setting there and back with such notables as the manager of Goldman Sachs asian division. This much I have confirmed with my own independent research.

We also know that Aaron was acquinted with Nick however briefly, because we are looking at the two together in this picture, with Nick on the right:

The two men I’m looking at in this photograph appear to me to be on the best of terms.


We know the general concept couldn’t be too ludicrous: the U.S. Government funded research and development in the area of weaponized aerosol delivery of fast-acting carcinogens back in the fifties.

We know this isn’t the first time an allegation like this has been made, perhaps the most notable example in respect to the death of Bob Marley of melanoma cancer in 1981.

We know we have documented precedents of similar crimes occurring. If you choose to boil all this down to a high-tech spin on murder by poison — which it is — then the list of previous documented examples would stretch from here to the moon and back — with an emphasis  on royalty, politicians, the wealthy elite, and black ops operatives.

We know we have at least one documented example of a similar recent crime in the poisoning death of the Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko. From Wikipedia:

Alexander Litvinenko was a former officer of the Russian Federal Security Service, FSB and KGB, who escaped prosecution in Russia and received political asylum in the United Kingdom. He wrote two books, Blowing up Russia: Terror from within and Lubyanka Criminal Group, where he accused the Russian secret services of staging Russian apartment bombings and other terrorism acts to bring Vladimir Putin to power.

On 1 November 2006, Litvinenko suddenly fell ill and was hospitalized. He died three weeks later, becoming the first confirmed victim of lethal polonium-210-induced acute radiation syndrome. According to doctors, “Litvinenko’s murder represents an ominous landmark: the beginning of an era of nuclear terrorism”.

Litvinenko’s allegations about the misdeeds of the FSB and his public deathbed accusations that Russian president Vladimir Putin were behind his unusual malady resulted in worldwide media coverage.

Subsequent investigations by British authorities into the circumstances of Litvinenko’s death led to serious diplomatic difficulties between the British and Russian governments. Unofficially, British authorities asserted that “we are 100% sure who administered the poison, where and how”, but they did not disclose their evidence in the interest of a future trial. The main suspect in the case, a former officer of the Russian Federal Protective Service (FSO), Andrei Lugovoy, remains in Russia. As a member of the Duma, he now enjoys immunity from prosecution. Before he was elected to the Duma, the British government tried to extradite him without success.


You people need to wake up to the fact that this is how your overlords — your puppetmasters — operate. Just another day at the office…  “Aaron Russo’s dead.”  “Oh, good. What a pain that guy was. How ’bout those Cards… whaddaya drinking?”

Now go back to the Wikipedia article and reread the first paragraph. This man isn’t making any allegations. This man is telling you straight-up and straight-out: “This is who I am, this is who I worked for, this is what we did.”

What it amounts to is that the Russian version of the CIA was directly responsible for the planning and carrying-out of false-flag terrorist bombing attacks on domestic (Russian) soil — the Russian version of 9/11. Well, I’m somehow vaguely comforted — misery always loves company — we’ve got ’em doing the same thing over here.

The few at the top ultimately responsible for the occurence of these events are globalist in worldview, they recognize no allegiance to national borders, political parties, religious persuasions, any of that. Consolidation of complete global power is their only aim, nothing else.


If you stop to think about it, if Aaron Russo was assassinated by the administering of an exotic poison and his untimely demise a legitimate crime,  then these two crimes under analysis here — Russo and Litvinenko — are identical: they’re the same crime!

1) A false-flag attack is perpetrated on domestic soil by elements of the country’s own intelligence agencies…

2) A lone whistle-blower comes forward to tell the tale…

3) Said whistle-blower is subsequently dispatched by way of an exotic poison.


On The Other Hand…

There are a couple of elements regarding Aaron’s supposition that are hard to wrap your head around when attempting to view this scenario as a viable crime. But these pyschological factors. which actually represent exercises in critical misthinking, would have only offered the perpetrator(s) a decided edge were the crime more real than imagined. Because murders are won in the hearts and minds of the medical examiner and district attorney. Fool the one or demoralize the other and you’ve just bought yourself a “get out of jail free” card.

The first question any rational mind would ask itself concerning this case is: Why would anyone want to eliminate someone using a method that takes so long to culminate in death? Six years? Come on… On its face it really sounds kind of ridiculous — just nonsensical.

But I may have actually wrapped my head all the way around that one, and believe me, it wasn’t easy…

First off, the date of death is a far lesser consideration in a case like this than the date of the poisoning, which represents the date of the actual murder as far as I’m concerned. And that was coincidentally in 2001, when all this was kicking off and going on. So that fits.

It’s almost irrelevant how long it takes the body to drop — the crime was committed in 2001, when all these other relevant crimes were in the process of being committed. We don’t know how long it may have been expected that Aaron would survive after the fatal dose was administered. Two years? Maybe even as little as six months? Maybe Aaron just beat all the odds and held out a lot longer than anyone would have expected, who can say? Look at Lance Armstrong. Maybe something went wrong with the dose, or he didn’t get the full dose, or he ended-up vomiting most of it back up, or it was just some crappy shit made in China… who can say?

This was simple eyewitness testimony and once it’s out you can’t put the cat back in the bag. The damage was done. It was obvious it wasn’t going to court anytime soon. So an act such as this might be perpetrated along the lines of a “Gotcha, Sucka” more than anything else. I could see it happening. And if his alleged poisoning was part of a witness eradication program, given the time it would’ve taken to bring such a monumental conspiracy case (9/11) to court, on top of the typical trial delays, Aaron could reasonably have been expected to either be deceased by that time, or too severely ill to take the stand.

The other one is that because the rational mind wants to lump Aaron in with the “conspiracy theorists”  it tends to tell itself it’s only natural he would even manufacture a conspiracy over something like this. The guy sees a conspiracy behind every rock, bush and tree. He’d probably cry conspiracy if he caught a cold. More critical misthinking, since again, Aaron played the role of simple, straightforward eyewitness in this case and nothing more: “This is who I am, this is who I knew, this is what he said.”

After being told and retold, over and over again and again, Aaron’s story remained amazingly consistent. He never added anything to it or took anything away. When given the opportunity to embellish on his story he flatly refused. These are all the hallmark characteristics of an honest and truthful witness.


Let’s see now, do I want the cancer or the stroke… hard decision! How about neither?


“Life is hard; it’s harder if you’re stupid.”  — John Wayne


There is nothing contained in the typical carbonated beverage that is “good for you”. Nothing. In fact, as far as I’m concerned, the stuff is pure poison and anathema to the human physiology. I don’t buy them, I don’t drink them. In my outlook, if these products don’t come equipped with a cancer warning label, the containers should at least offer up the advisory: “For occasional use only”.

But there’s the rub: I have consumed these products, and I’ve noticed that once I pop the top on one, it’s “off to the races”. As soon as I put this stuff in my body, it immediately cries out for more… and more. These sodas are more addictive than crack cocaine. So it’s no wonder these megacorporations that produce them are among the largest and most successful in the world.

But if you’re one of these who are pouring this stuff into your body every day and night of your life, you’ve got a death wish in my opinion. You need to get off them, today. And you need to be drinking pure water, pure fruit and/or vegetable juices, milk, tea, a little coffee is good, and I’ve been seeing over and over again that one glass of red wine a day is also beneficial — one.

The healthiest habit you could ever adopt is drinking lots of pure water throughout each 24-hour period. But not tap water emanating from municipal drinking water supplies. That contains a lethal cocktail of toxic chemicals such as sodium flouride, which is only slightly less poisonous than arsenic, in a formula developed by Nazi mind control scientists for use in mass population control during the rise of the Third Reich. This is documented fact. Its intended effects are to make you docile and more easily controllable by the “authorities”, and has been linked as well to everything from bone deformation and ADHD, to Alzheimer’s and sterility. See my tap water article for a comprehensive expose’ on this subject.

You know guys, there are simple, basic reasons why we have transformed into a nation of  couch potatoes who are now dropping like flies in a sandstorm in our 30s, 40s and 50s from heart attacks, strokes, and every insidious variety of cancer known to man. And most of this we have a large amount of control over. If there’s anything I’ve learned in life, it’s that what goes into and comes out of our mouths carries the most potential for damage and destruction — both to ourselves and others.  Or maybe that’s just me…

Now on to the relevant news…



Coca-Cola Co. and PepsiCo Inc. are changing the way they make the caramel coloring used in their sodas as a result of a California law that mandates drinks containing a certain level of carcinogens bear a cancer warning label.

The companies said the changes will be expanded nationally to streamline their manufacturing processes. They’ve already been made for drinks sold in California.

A representative for Coca-Cola, Diana Garza Ciarlante, said the company directed its caramel suppliers to modify their manufacturing processes to reduce the levels of the chemical 4-methylimidazole, which can be formed during the cooking process and as a result may be found in trace amounts in many foods.

“While we believe that there is no public health risk that justifies any such change, we did ask our caramel suppliers to take this step so that our products would not be subject to the requirement of a scientifically unfounded warning,”  Garza-Giarlante said in an email.

The American Beverage Association, which represents the broader beverage industry, said its member companies will still use caramel coloring in certain products but that adjustments were made to meet California’s new standard.

“Consumers will notice no difference in our products and have no reason at all for any health concerns,”  the association said in a statement.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), a consumer advocacy group, disagrees. In February the organization filed a petition with the Food and Drug Administration to ban the use of ammonia-sulfite caramel coloring.

A spokesman for the Food and Drug Administration said the petition is being reviewed. But he noted that a consumer would have to drink more than 1,000 cans of soda a day to reach the doses administered that have shown links to cancer in rodents.

The American Beverage Association also noted that California added the coloring to its list of carcinogens with no studies showing that it causes cancer in humans. The listing was based on a single study in lab mice and rats.

Citing studies that link several types of cancer to 4-methylimidazole, the head of the CSPI stated that jeopardizing people’s health simply to give colas their familiar brown hue is just not acceptable.

“There are 310 million Americans and we’re saying that about 15-thousand of us will develop cancer as a result of the caramel coloring,”  said Michael Jacobson. CSPI’s executive director.

In response, the American Beverage Association issued a statement questioning the science of the studies cited by the CSPI. The statement reads, in part, “This is nothing more than CSPI scare tactics, and their claims are outrageous. CSPI fraudulently claims to be operating in the interest of the public’s health when it is clear its only motivation is to scare the American people.”


Let’s see now, who should we believe: the State of California and an organization which only exists to help protect the interests of consumers, or the corporations whose very survival hinges on profits derived from the sale of these products and the trade association they pay to further their own interests?

Man, that’s a tough one…


Special thanks to MSN, located at:


USA Today, located at:


 Are the vast majority of contemporary cancer victims going to early graves needlessly?


“A Canadian study looking at heart patients taking drugs to prevent clots found an 87% reduction in cancer deaths and a 100% reduction in deaths from metastatic cancer.”  — Michaels L., Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Patients Having Anticoagulant Therapy, Lancet 1964; ii: 832-5


80% of all cancer-related deaths may be totally unnecessary. That’s 8 out of 10 and also stunning news. There’s not much mystery left in cancer, if any. The medical and scientific community know basically how it’s caused, and basically how it’s cured. And perhaps more importantly, they know better than basically how it’s effectively prevented, which is particularly essential with this specific disease.

Cancer rates are at an all-time high, and we’re now in the process of dropping like flies from every insidious variety of this disease imaginable, at ever-younger ages.

Yet you go back 100 years ago and cancer was relatively rare. So what’s changed?

Well, the short answer is: if your breakfast consists of a cup of coffee and two cigarettes, your lunch consists of Taco Bell, your dinner consists of Hamburger Helper and some ice cream followed or preceded (or both) by a couple of drinks and/or maybe a joint or two, you can’t remember when the last time you intentionally exercised was, you’re spending the sheer bulk of your time indoors, and every time you get the munchies you reach for another Coke and a Reese Cup or another bag of Cheetos… you’re going to come down with cancer, sometime during the course of your (unnecessarily and tragically-shortened) lifetime. Guaranteed. Because you’ve just broken every known law in the survival manual. And you’re doing it all day, every day. Suicide is your lifestyle. You seriously don’t want to live a long and happy life, preferring instead, I assume, to go out in a blaze of Doritos.

And I’m factoring out a lot of examples that could have been on the “short list” above but were not, and would vary with the individual. And also any enhanced risk factors due to occupational exposure to toxic chemicals, etc.


The Prime Cause and Prevention of Cancer

Dr. Otto Warburg
Lecture delivered to Nobel Laureates on June 30, 1966
at Lindau, Lake Constance, Germany

There are prime and secondary causes of diseases. For example, the prime cause of the plague is the plague bacillus, but secondary causes of the plague are filth, rats, and the fleas that transfer the plague bacillus from rats to man. By the prime cause of a disease, I mean one that is found in every case of the disease.

Cancer, above all other diseases, has countless secondary causes. Almost anything can cause cancer. But, even for cancer, there is only one prime cause. The prime cause of cancer is the replacement of the respiration of oxygen (oxidation of sugar) in normal body cells by fermentation of sugar.

All normal body cells meet their energy needs by respiration of oxygen, whereas cancer cells meet their energy needs in great part by fermentation. All normal body cells are thus obligate aerobes, whereas all cancer cells are partial anaerobes. From the standpoint of the physics and chemistry of life this difference between normal and cancer cells is so great that one can scarcely picture a greater difference. Oxygen gas, the donor of energy in plants and animals, is dethroned in the cancer cells and replaced by the energy yielding reaction of the lowest living forms, namely the fermentation of sugar.

In every case, during the cancer development, the oxygen respiration always falls, fermentation appears, and the highly differentiated cells are transformed into fermenting anaerobes,  which have lost all their body functions and retain only the now useless property of growth and replication. Thus, when respiration disappears, life does not disappear, but the meaning of life disappears, and what remains are growing machines that destroy the body in which they grow.

All carcinogens impair respiration directly or indirectly by deranging capillary circulation, a statement that is proven by the fact that no cancer cell exists without exhibiting impaired respiration. Of course, respiration cannot be repaired if it is impaired at the same time by a carcinogen.

To prevent cancer it is therefore proposed first to keep the speed of the blood stream so high that the venous blood still contains sufficient oxygen; second, to keep high the concentration of hemoglobin in the blood; third, to add always to the food, even of healthy people, the active groups of the respiratory enzymes; and to increase the doses of these groups, if a precancerous state has already developed. If at the same time exogenous carcinogens are excluded rigorously, then much of the endogenous cancer may be prevented today.

These proposals are in no way utopian. On the contrary, they may be realized by everybody, everywhere, at any hour. Unlike the prevention of many other diseases, the prevention of cancer requires no government help, and not much money.

Many experts agree that one could prevent about 80% of all cancers in man, if one could keep away the known carcinogens from the normal body cells. But how can the remaining 20%, the so-called spontaneous cancers, be prevented? It is indisputable that all cancer could be prevented if the respiration of body cells were kept intact.

Nobody today can say that one does not know what the prime cause of cancer is. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is better known, so that today ignorance is no longer an excuse for avoiding measures for prevention. That the prevention of cancer will come there is no doubt. But how long prevention will be avoided depends on how long the prophets of agnosticism will succeed in inhibiting the application of scientific knowledge in the cancer field. In the meantime, millions of men and women must die of cancer unnecessarily.


“The great advantage of knowing the prime cause of a disease is that it can then be attacked logically and over a broad front. This is particularly important in the case of cancer, with its numerous secondary and remote causes, and because it is often stated that in man alone there are over one hundred well-known and quite different kinds of cancer, usually with the implication that therefore we will have to find one or several hundred bases for prevention and treatment, and usually without any realization that this need not necessarily be the case now that we know that all cancers studied have a characteristic metabolism in common, a prime cause.”  — Dr. Otto Warburg, two-time Nobel prize winner.


Cancer and Oxygen

Dr. Otto Warburg received the Nobel prize in 1931 for the discovery that unlike all other cells in the human body, cancer cells do not breathe oxygen. Cancer cells are anaerobic, which means that they derive their energy without needing oxygen.

It turns out that cancer cells cannot survive in the presence of high levels of oxygen and this has given rise to a variety of successful treatments based on oxygenating the tissues, such as intravenous hydrogen peroxide, hyperbaric oxygen tank, and blood ozonation.

EWOT (Exercise With Oxygen Therapy) is doing light exercise, such as on a treadmill or stationary bicycle, while breathing pure oxygen. EWOT produces the benefits of intravenous hydrogen peroxide therapy and you can do it at home.

Dietary supplementation with DMG (Dimethylglycine) increases oxygen utilization in hypoxic tissues, helping to prevent cancer and many other problems.


“A mass spectrographic analysis of cancer cells showed that the cell membrane readily attached cesium, rubidium and potassium, and transmitted these elements with their associated molecules into the cancer cell. In contrast cancer membranes did not transmit sodium, magnesium, and calcium into the cell: the amount of calcium within a cancer cell is only about 1% of that for normal cells. Potassium transports glucose into the cell. Calcium and magnesium transport oxygen into the cell. As a consequence of the above, oxygen cannot enter cancer cells so the glucose which is normally burned to carbon dioxide and water undergoes fermentation to form lactic acid within the cell. This anaerobic condition was pointed out by Warburg, as early as 1924.

Potassium, and especially rubidium and cesium are the most basic of the elements. When they are taken up by the cancer cells they will thus raise the pH of the cells. Since they are very strong bases as compared to the weak lactic acid it is possible that the pH will be raised to values in the 8.5 to 9 range. In this range the life of the cancer cell is short, being a matter of days at the most. The dead cancer cells are then absorbed by the body fluids and eventually eliminated from the system.”  — Dr. Brewer, from High pH Cancer Therapy with Cesium


There is research indicating that cancer grows slowly in a highly acid environment (because the acids cause it to partially destroy itself) and may actually grow more quickly as your body becomes more alkaline prior to reaching the healthy pH slightly above 7.4 where the cancer becomes dormant. Therefore, you will want to get your pH above 7.4 as quickly as possible by every means available. Once you have achieved a pH above 7.4, it is useful to monitor your saliva pH regularly to ensure that your body remains sufficiently alkaline.


Acidity and Free Radicals

Much has been written about free radicals and cancer. A harmful free radical is an ion that has a positive electrical charge. An electron has a negative electrical charge. Due to its positive charge, the free radical attracts electrons from other molecules, thereby damaging them. Sources of free radicals include farm chemicals (fertilizers and pesticides), many prescription drugs, processed foods, cigarette smoke, environmental pollution, alcohol, electromagnetic radiation, and stress.


Special thanks to Alkalize for Health, located at:








             Concerning this particular gem, what you don’t know can surely kill you


“Recent research shows that microwave-cooked food suffers severe molecular damage. When eaten, it causes abnormal changes in human blood and immune systems. Not surprisingly, the public has been denied details on these significant health dangers.”

                                                                                                   Dr. Mercola


After World War II, the Russians experimented with microwave ovens. From 1957 on, their research was mainly carried out at the Institute of Radio Technology at Klinsk, Byelorussia. According to US researcher William Kopp, who gathered much of the results of Russian re-search and was eventually prosecuted for doing so (Journal of Natural Science, 1998; 1:42 – 3), the following effects were observed by Russian forensic teams:

1. Heating prepared meats in a microwave sufficiently for human consumption created:

* d-Nitrosodiethanolamine (a well known cancer-causing agent).

* Destabilization of active protein biomolecular compounds.

* Creation of a binding effect to radioactivity in the atmosphere.

* Creation of cancer-causing agents within protein hydrosylate compounds in milk and cereal grains.

2. Microwave emissions also caused alteration in the catabolic (breakdown) behavior of glucoside and galactoside elements within frozen fruits when thawed in this way.

3. Microwaves altered catabolic behavior of plant alkaloids when raw, cooked or frozen vegetables were exposed for even very short periods. 

4. Cancer-causing free radicals were formed within certain trace-mineral molecular formations in plant substances, especially in raw root vegetables.

5. Ingestion of microwaved foods caused a higher percentage of cancerous cells in blood.

6. Due to chemical alterations within food substances, malfunctions occurred in the lymphatic system, causing degeneration of the immune system’s capacity to protect itself against cancerous growth.

7. The unstable catabolism of microwaved foods altered their elemental food substances, leading to disorders in the digestive system.

8. Those ingesting microwaved foods showed a statistically higher incidence of stomach and intestinal cancers, plus a general degeneration of peripheral cellular tissues with a gradual breakdown of digestive and excretory system function.

9. Microwave exposure caused significant decreases in the nutritional value of all foods studied, particularly:

* A decrease in the bioavailability of B-complex vitamins, vitamin C, vitamin E, essential minerals and lipotrophics.

* Destruction of the nutritional value of nucleoproteins in meats.

* Lowering of the metabolic activity of alkaloids, glucosides, galactosides and nitrilosides (all basic plant substances in fruits and vegetables).

* Marked acceleration of structural disintegration in all foods.

As a result of this research, the Soviets banned the use of microwave ovens in 1976 and issued an international warning on the health hazards, both biological and environmental, of these appliances and similar-frequency electronic devices. The ban was lifted after Pere-stroika when the Russians decided to jump on the capitalist bandwagon.


Still not ready to give it up? Here’s an experiment you can try at home:

Buy two identical small houseplants in the same stage of growth and state of health. Then pick up a gallon of bottled water.  Pour half of the water into a pot and bring it to a boil on your stovetop. Then pour the other half gallon of water into a microwavable container and bring it to a boil in your microwave oven. When the water cools, pour the water from the stovetop back into the jug it came from, then pour the microwaved water into a separate, similar jug or any suitable container. Label both containers with a magic marker so you can keep track of which is which. Label the plant pots too. If need be, use some masking tape or gummed labels along with the marker. The labels can simply say “Microwave” and “Regular”.

Now simply water the houseplants as you normally would, only making sure that the plant marked “Microwave” only gets the water that came out of the microwave oven, and that the plant marked “Regular”, only gets the water which was boiled normally.

The results of your experiment should roughly mirror the examples below:


Everybody who’s tried this has gotten the same exact results. In fact, if you start out with seeds instead of plants, the seed which is irrigated with the microwaved water won’t even germinate. After this, I shudder every time I stop and think how much coffee I’ve heated and reheated in the microwave and drank over the last several years — enough to float a battleship. Maybe that’s why I tended to feel crappy and sluggish and run-down the whole time too. Now I heat my coffee water in a pot on the stove. It really doesn’t take much longer. Sure, it’s a little more inconvenient, but not half as inconvenient as a brain tumor
or bone marrow cancer.