Posts Tagged ‘Aliens’


Be advised I have been able to obtain zero independent authentification for this clip, as in none whatsoever. It is billed as CNN Breaking News, but there’s no evidence of that offered in the video, and I was unable to find any CNN footage it belonged to either.

Still I found it compelling enough to include here after watching it several times. You be the judge: real, or fake?


Black Triangle as Seen From Orbit by The Space Shuttle 









Well I have never posted up anything like this before, and believe me, I’ve seen it all. So you know it’s gotta be good. This could well be it — the smoking gun.

Are we looking at actual aliens here? I think we could be. If not, it ranks as the single best hoax I’ve ever seen, and I’ve spent thousands of hours over the course of a lifetime investigating into this area, personally reviewing everything available to date. Their appearance fits the sum total of all previous “eyewitness” accounts, down to the eyes, which have been uniformly described as “glossy black and teardrop-shaped, but with something moving behind them”, which I surmised meant their actual eyes were simply concealed behind dark teardop-shaped protective lenses, on the order of our sunglasses. Theirs simply don’t have any frames. Cool!


Documentary proof of interdimensional travel was provided by a UK military officer

The British Ministry of Defence released 34 recently-declassified files totalling around 8,500 pages of documentation concerning sightings of unidentified flying objects on Thursday, March 3, 2011. They include encounters by both the public and the military stretching as far back as the 1950s, but mainly concentrate on the time period between 1997 to 2005.

These files are currently residing in the UK National Archives and will be available for free download in PDF form by the public for 30 days from the date of release (March 3rd). After that, they will still be available for download, but a fee will be attached. They also have available previously-released declassified UFO documents, downloadable for a fee.

To get your free UFO file download, go to the UK National Archives internet website loca-ted at: 





Okay, I had watched this particular video a few times and really liked it. The quality is good, the content is good, it does a good job of covering the Chilbolton and Crabwood Farm House crop circles, and it features an appearance by Paul Vigay, the cracker of the Crabwood disk code, who died not long afterward under mysterious circumstances.

I was deleting a lot of stuff that had accumulated on my favorites list when I stumbled across it again and decided to give it another viewing, thinking I might stick it somewhere on my site.

And that’s when it happened. After viewing this video I don’t know how many times and never catching it, this time something caught my eye around midscreen beginning at 3:14, as the producers were flying over the Crabwood “alien face” crop circle and shooting footage for the video. I watched as it moved to the right in a roughly horizontal trajectory and finally off the frame at 3:19. It is visible for 5 full seconds, travelling at a constant, moderate rate of speed.

To be a little more specific in terms of the UFO’s location within the frame: if you draw an imaginary line across your screen horizontally at the midpoint, and another one vertically at the midpoint in order to form four equal quadrants, you will be watching the upper right-hand quadrant. If you consider the top of your screen to be north, the bottom south, the right side east and the left side west, the UFO exits the treeline at the midpoint of the screen, pretty much where that white tower is located on the south side of the treeline. Then the UFO traverses the field where the crop circle is located, moving east-northeast, passing just to the right of that black pylon in the crop circle field and contining along a steady course and out of the frame.

Is this just the shadow on the ground of the airplane or the helicopter that the film crew is travelling in?  Judging from the shadows of the underlying ground obstructions, it is in about the right location. It is also moving in the same general direction, and travelling at around the same velocity. So that is surely the most plausible explanation.

There’s only one problem, however. If it’s simply a shadow, then why is it glowing? Where is all the luminescence coming from? In fact, when the “object” first enters the frame, all you see is the luminescence, but that is also coming from a darker field of view, or back-ground, so the aircraft’s shadow itself might tend to be inconspicuous at that point, leaving only the peripheral luminescence visible to the naked eye.

If the film crew’s aircraft were really shiny, say unpainted aluminum or pehaps metallic silver in color, with the sun behind it as it is throughout this sequence, would it result in a ground shadow that’s ringed by reflected light?

Honestly I don’t think I’ve seen that effect before, and I’m certainly no expert image ana-lyst, so I’m asking you: what do you think? We’ve got to have the fastest, easiest, most confidential comment-uploading system available on the web today. I tried it out myself to see what it was all about, and managed to get a comment up online in around 30 seconds or less, using only my initials as personal information — no sign-up, no log-in. no email adddress, no nothing…


Is this man standing on the lunar surface or on a soundstage at Area 51?


“Those conspiracies that are too incredible to be believed, are by the same right, those which most often succeed.”

“Only the small secrets need to be protected. The large ones are kept secret by public incredulity.”Marshall McLuhan


It’s a simple message:  If we, with the relatively primitive technology available to us in the 1960s, can leave our world and travel to another, then aliens, who could possibly be any-where from hundreds to hundreds of thousands of years more advanced than we are, can surely leave their own world and travel here…

Sounds like a no-brainer for sure. But the resources in time, money, and effort that have been funneled into the positive and repetitive reinforcement of that simple concept in the minds of the world’s population at large over a period of decades have been no less than staggering. It’s been ongoing and relentless and it continues to this very day.

In fact, they’ve recently been wearing it out. The most superb and graphic example would have to be the intro to the television series Ancient Aliens  on The History Channel, where they spell this same simple repetitive message out to the letter in sight and sound: visuals of the 1969 Apollo moon landing, and a voice-over assuring us all that if we can travel to other worlds, so can the aliens — the Apollo missions have proven that, undebatably, undeniably, and unequivocably.  Only trouble is, every bit of it’s based on a lie, and what was very probably even the greatest hoax of the 20th century.

Some good questions here would be: “Toward what end is this being done? What’s the payoff, and when is it coming? And who is it coming for? And at who’s expense?”


“Some one remarked that the best way to unite all the nations on this globe would be an attack from some other planet. In the face of such an alien enemy, people would respond with a sense of their unity of interest and purpose.” — John Dewey, 1917

“In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us realize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world.” — President Ronald Reagan, 1987


Some excerpts from William Cooper’s Majesty Twelve, written in 1997:

The plan for the creation of a socialist world government is protected by an artificial extra-terrestrial threat from space. The entire UFO phenomenon and the uFOOLogy movement has been created to further the protection and activation of the plan. Within Majesty Twelve  is Operation Majority, justifying the plan by presenting an extraterrestrial threat as the reason for the necessity for world government.

To make interstellar travel believable NASA was created. The Apollo Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon. The effect upon the people of the world was that if we could go to the moon other creatures from other worlds could travel to our Earth. The escalation of the artificial alien threat scenario since that time is obvious.

Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commission’s top secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a huge scale mock-up of the moon. Exploration of the moon stopped because it was impossible to continue the hoax without being discovered. And of course they ran out of pre-filmed episodes.

No man has ever ascended much higher than 300 miles, if that high, above the Earth’s surface. At or under that altitude the astronauts are beneath the radiation of the Van Allen Belt and the Van Allen Belt shields them from the extreme radiation which permeates space. No man has ever orbited, landed on, or walked upon the moon in any publicly known space program. If man has ever truly been to the moon it has been done in secret and with a far different technology.

The tremendous radiation encountered in the Van Allen Belt, solar radiation, cosmic radi-ation, solar flares, temperature control, and many other problems connected with space travel prevent living organisms leaving our atmosphere with our known level of technol-ogy. Any intelligent high school student with a basic physics book can prove NASA faked the Apollo moon landings

If you doubt this please explain how the astronauts walked upon the moon’s surface enclosed in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a minimum of 265 degrees of heat sur-rounded by a vacuum… and that is not even taking into consideration any effects of cosmic radiation, solar flares, micrometeorites, etc. NASA tells us the moon has no atmosphere and that the astronauts were surrounded by the vacuum of space.

Heat is defined as the vibration or movement of molecules within matter. The faster the molecular motion the higher the temperature. The slower the molecular motion the colder the temperature. Absolute zero is that point where all molecular motion ceases. In order to have hot or cold, molecules must be present.

A vacuum is a condition of nothingness where there are no molecules. Vacuums exist in degrees. Some scientists tell us that there is no such thing as an absolute vacuum. Space is the closest thing to an absolute vacuum that is known to us. There are so few molecules present in most areas of what we know as “space” that any concept of “hot” or “cold” is impossible to measure. A vacuum is a perfect insulator. That is why a Thermos (vacuum) bottle is used to store hot or cold liquids in order to maintain the temperature for the longest time possible without re-heating or re-cooling.

Radiation of all types will travel through a vacuum but will not affect the vacuum. Radiant heat from the sun travels through the vacuum of space but does not “warm” space. In fact the radiant heat of the sun has no affect whatsoever until it strikes matter. Molecular movement will increase in direct proportion to the radiant energy which is absorbed by matter. The time it takes to heat matter exposed to direct sunlight in space is determined by its color, its elemental properties, its distance from the sun, and its rate of absorption of radiant heat energy. Space is not  hot. Space is not cold.

Objects which are heated cannot be cooled by space. In order for an object to cool it must first be removed from direct sunlight. Objects which are in the shadow of another object will eventually cool but not because space is “cold”. Space is not cold. Hot and cold do not exist in the vacuum of space. Objects cool because the laws of motion dictate that the molecules of the object will slow down due to the resistance resulting from striking other molecules until eventually all motion will stop provided the object is sheltered from the direct and/or indirect radiation of the sun and that there is no other source of heat. Since the vacuum of space is the perfect insulator objects take a very long time to cool even when removed from all sources of heat, radiated or otherwise.

NASA insists the space suits the astronauts supposedly wore on the lunar surface were air conditioned. An air conditioner cannot, and will not work without a heat exchanger. A heat exchanger simply takes heat gathered in a medium such as freon from one place and transfers it to another place. This requires a medium of molecules which can absorb and transfer the heat such as an atmosphere or water. An air conditioner will not and cannot work in a vacuum. A space suit surrounded by a vacuum cannot transfer heat from the inside of the suit to any other place. The vacuum, remember, is a perfect insulator. A man would roast in his suit in such a circumstance.

NASA claims the spacesuits were cooled by a water system which was piped around the body, then through a system of coils sheltered from the sun in the backpack. NASA claims that water was sprayed on the coils causing a coating of ice to form. The ice then suppos-edly absorbed the tremendous heat collected in the water and evaporated into space. There are two problems with this that cannot be explained away. 1) The amount of water needed to be carried by the astronauts in order to make this work for even a very small length of time in the direct 55 degrees over the boiling point of water (210 degrees F. at sea level on Earth) heat of the sun could not have possibly been carried by the astronauts. 2) NASA has since claimed that they found ice in moon craters. NASA claims that ice sheltered from the direct rays of the sun will not evaporate, destroying their own bogus “air conditioning” explanation.

Remember this. Think about it the next time you go off in the morning with a “vacuum bottle” filled with hot coffee. Think about it long and hard when you sit down and pour a piping hot cup from your thermos to drink with your lunch four hours later… and then think about it again when you pour the last still very warm cup of coffee at the end of the day.

The same laws of physics apply to any vehicle traveling through space. NASA claims that the spacecraft was slowly rotated causing the shadowed side to be cooled by the intense cold of space… an intense cold that does not exist. In fact the only thing that could have been accomplished by a rotation of the spacecraft is a more even and constant heating such as that obtained by rotating a hot dog on a spit. In reality a dish called Astronaut a la Apollo would have been served. At the very least you would not want to open the hatch upon the crafts return.

NASA knows better than to claim, in addition, that a water cooling apparatus such as that which they claim cooled the astronauts suits cooled the spacecraft. No rocket could ever have been launched with the amount of water needed to work such a system for even a very short period of time. Fresh water weighs a little over 62 lbs. per cubic foot. Space and weight capacity were critical given the lift capability of the rockets used in the Apollo Space Program. No such extra water was carried by any mission whatsoever for suits or for cooling the spacecraft.

On the tapes the Astronauts complained bitterly of the cold during their journey and while on the surface of the moon. They spoke of using heaters that did not give off enough heat to overcome the intense cold of space. It was imperative that NASA use this ruse because to tell the truth would tell the truth.

What we heard is in reality indicative of an over zealous cooling system in the props used during the filming of the missions at the Atomic Energy Commissions Nevada desert test site, where it is common to see temperatures well over 100 degrees. In the glaring unfil-tered direct heat of the sun the Astronauts could never have been cold at any time whatso-ever in the perfect insulating vacuum of space.

As proof examine the Lunar Lander on display in the Smithsonian Institute and notice the shrouded and encased cone of the rocket engine inside  the Lander which is attached above the rocket nozzle at the bottom center of the Lander. It is this rocket engine which suppos-edly provided the retro thrust upon landing on the moon and the takeoff thrust during takeoff from the moon. In the actual Lunar Lander this engine is present but in the film and pictures of the inside of the Lunar Lander that was “said” to be on the moon the engine is absent. Then examine the Lunar Lander simulator and you will see exactly where the fake footage was filmed.

It would also be a good idea for you to measure the dimensions of the astronauts in their spacesuits and then measure the actual usable dimensions of the hatch that they had to use to egress and ingress the Lander. Also measure the inside dimensions of the actual Lander and you will see that the astronauts could not have possibly left or entered in their suits through that hatch. Notice the position of the hinge of the hatch and then examine the Lunar Lander training simulator and measure all the dimensions noted above taking care to note the position of the hinge on the much larger hatch and you may become “illumined”… so to speak.

NASA claims that the space suits worn by the astronauts were pressurized at 5 psi over the ambient pressure (0 psi vacuum) on the moon’s surface. We have examined the gloves NASA claims the astronauts wore and find they are made of pliable material containing no mechanical, hydraulic, or electrical devices which would aid the astronauts in the dexterous use of their fingers and hands while wearing the gloves. Experiments prove absolutely that such gloves are impossible to use and that the wearer cannot bend the wrist or fingers to do any dexterous work whatsoever when filled with 5 psi over ambient pressure either in a vacuum or in the earth’s atmosphere. NASA actually showed film and television footage of astronauts using their hands and fingers normally during their EVAs (extra-vehicular activities) on the so-called lunar surface. The films show clearly that there is no pressure whatsoever within the gloves… a condition that would have caused explosive decompres-sion of the astronauts resulting in almost immediate death if they had really been sur-rounded by the vacuum of space.

If you don’t believe it try it yourself… it is a very simple experiment and does not require a rocket scientist to perform. These are just a few of over a hundred very simple and very easy to prove valid scientific reasons why NASA and the Apollo Space Program are two of the biggest lies ever foisted upon the unsuspecting and trusting people of the world.

We attempted to obtain data on solar activity and in particular Solar flares which may have been active during the Apollo Moon Missions. We found that data is available for any day of any year during which data has been collected except  the days and hours of all of the Apollo Moon shots. That data can not be obtained from any government agency including NASA, NOAA, or the Naval Observatory. This is data that is normally collected and would have been used in calculating the dates of launch, dates and times of EVAs, and extreme radiation hazard. It would have been monitored during times of EVAs of the astronauts while on the moon… that is if any astronauts were ever on the moon. The data is not available because it would demonstrate that the so-called astronauts would have been fried crisp. They would have returned to the earth dead  if they had actually attempted any such missions.

In addition most, if not all, of the photos, films, and videotape of the Apollo Moon Missions are easily proven to be fake. Anyone with the slightest knowledge of studio photography, studio lighting, and the reality of Lunar physics can easily prove that NASA faked the visual records of the Apollo Space Program. No color film known to man, then or now, had or has the latitude to produce the excellent detail found in shadow and highlighted areas of the photographs supposedly taken on the moon. Any professional photographer can tell you that those photographs could only have been produced in a controlled environment using studio lighting and could not possibly have been produced in full sunlight in a vacuum on the moon. Some are so obviously fake that when the discrepancies are pointed out to unsuspecting viewers an audible gasp has been heard. Some have actually gone into a mild state of shock. Some people break down and cry. I have seen others become so angry that they have ripped the offending photos to shreds while screaming incoherently.

The Soviet Union planned only one manned moon mission. Soviet cosmonauts related to me that their astronauts were literally cooked  by the extreme radiation in space when sent into high orbit through the Van Allen Belt. The USSR never again attempted to send men into or above the Van Allen Belt. If man could not survive the extreme radiation of the Van Allen Belt how could they put a man on the Moon? The Soviet Union scrapped their Man on the Moon  program.


The preceding commentary has been lightly edited for style and format but not for content. You can access the much more comprehensive original document on the Hour of the Time website located at:


Because it would take a full volume to adequately explore this topic and because of the monumental enhancement that visuals provide in this instance, I’m making this my most video-dense offering so far: 2 series of five videos each for a total of 10 videos, and a bonus: the first two videos in the Jarrah White Apollo Zero series. 

I was going to include the entire Apollo Zero  series, as it is well worth watching, but ran into technical difficulties trying to embed two of the videos. I considered scrapping the whole project, but in the end decided to run the first two, as the detailed analysis of the Van Allen radiation belt and the following interview with astro-not Alan Bean is an absolute must-see.  The rest are available for viewing on YouTube or on Jarrah’s personal site located at:









Contains Content From: Nash Entertainment



           This “crop circle” was the first to deliver its message in unmistakable terms

Well, if we were just too unintelligent or unimaginative to grasp any intended meaning behind its ubiquitous global predecessors, we couldn’t fail with the one which is depicted above, which appeared in a wheat field at Crabwood Farm House on Lanham Lane outside of Winchester, England on August 12, 2002: a pictogram of the instantly recognizable albeit infinitely elusive alien “gray” and a disk encrypted in binary code. According to the late Paul Vigay of Southsea (Portsmouth), England, who is credited with solving the riddle through the application of ASCII, the code on the stylized CD translates into English as follows:

“Beware the bearers of FALSE gifts & their BROKEN PROMISES. Much PAIN but still time. (Damaged word). There is GOOD out there. We OPpose DECEPTION. Conduit CLOSING (BELL SOUND)”.

Note:  The “damaged word” has been generally translated as BELIEVE.


I believe this particular formation to be a hoax (along with the rest of them), as Vigay and some other researchers apparently did as well. Vigay gave his reasons as follows:

1) Although the “workmanship” appears quite sterling with a little elevation and therefore distance, at ground zero it’s actually somewhat crude, particularly as far as the coded disk goes. Crude enough that it was actually difficult to decipher, even when the formula was known. 2) The alien’s head is far off-center within the frame, being much closer to the left-hand side than the right. 3) The bottom two corners of the frame are not 90-degree ang-les. 4) A local witness told him that a helicopter had been heard in the vicinity around 2:00 am on the night the formation appeared in the wheat field. 5) A battery-powered, handheld “sighting device” was found in the field the next morning by one of Vigay’s associates.  

Vigay, who was the webmaster of a hard hitting British anti-NWO website and a leading crop circle and paranormal investigator, died under mysterious circumstances a couple of years ago at the age of 44. His body was found washed-up on a Southsea beach near his home on Manners Road on February 20, 2009. The local constabulary ruled there was “nothing suspicious about it” and chalked it up to apparent suicide, as just before he was last seen the night before, he’d suffered an emotional break-up with his long-time girl-friend, Andrea Smith. He’d also fallen into debt.

The coroner in the case, David Horsley, however, admitted the whole thing was something of a mystery, and recorded an “open” verdict, stating for the record: “I cannot say beyond reasonable doubt that yes, Paul has taken his own life.”

Perhaps the strangest element of the case was that, although anything resembling a tradi-tional suicide note was conspicuously absent, a note was  found in the house addressed to Andrea, saying only “I love you”, and listing all of his computer and cell phone passcodes. But when the police and family tried to use them, they found that none of them worked.


But apparently somebody’s keeping the lights on as you can still access his website. He was into some really heavy-duty stuff, not the least of which was pioneering research and cut-ting edge investigation into the crop circle phenomenon. For instance, he considered the destruction of the World Trade Center and the London subway bombings to be NWO false-flag attacks and was very outspoken on the subject. You can find enough material on his website to keep you going for awhile, and will more than likely stumble across an angle or two that you hadn’t yet heard about or considered. I’ll include a link to it here —


There are two generally accepted categories which these crop circles fall into: “genuine”, and “hoaxed”. According to, genuine = real. And in the largest and truest sense, all crop circles are “real”.  While many claims have been made about crop circles from mild to wild, I’ve never heard anyone posit the theory that they are either a mass hallucination or a figment of the collective imagination.

If we can all agree — at least for the purposes of this discussion — that all crop circles are “real” in the most fundamental sense, and not at all imaginary or fictitious, then our next question should be: “Well then, how do we go about classifying any of them as hoaxes?”

For all intents and purposes, a true science and accompanying investigative methodology has been developed along the way by serious researchers of these formations, who call themselves cereologists. That investigative method includes established scientific proto-cols through which these researchers discriminate what they consider to be genuine crop circles from those they consider to be hoaxed. So suffice it to say, from the viewpoint of the cereologists, all crop circles may be real, but not all of them are genuine.

The most dedicated cereologists utilize on-site visual inspection and collection of soil and grain samples, the latest high-tech instruments, and fully-equipped scientific laboratories in order to distinguish between the genuine article and the hoaxed. There is in fact bonafide evidence of enormous differences between the two generally acknowledged methods of creating these formations, which we shall classify here as either high-tech or low tech. While the low-tech methods typically used by hoaxers are known and include ropes and boards used to crush the grain and various sighting devices used to lay out the patterns, the actual high-tech methods utilized by what is generally attributed to nonhuman or extra-terrestial intelligence are currently unknown, though they manage to leave behind certain clues which can be qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed and documented. These include changes to the underlying soil indicative of a high-heat source, alterations within the grain itself at the cellular level, and the presence of measurable electromagnetic anomalies. The general consensus among the cereologists is that these clues collectively point to technolo-gy not currently present on this world — at least not in the hands of human beings.

This is where the typical cereologist and I hit the proverbial “fork in the trail”.  I’ll insert here a quote from Vigay’s website and then we’ll leave off from him, at least for the time being, although in a future article we may examine more closely the mysterious details surrounding his rather abrupt departure from this world:

“Because hoaxers can’t replicate some of the measurable electromagnetic effects being de-tected, and orthodox scientists are either uninterested or closed-minded to our results, Paul has continued investigating the electromagnetic effects in and around crop circle sites.”

I think this statement tends to sum up the general attitude of most cereologists, i.e: that the chief distinguishing characteristics of genuine crop circles cannot be duplicated by hoax-ers. And it is here where we part company in terms of our diverse belief systems.

My primary outlook is simply this: the only solid fact in existence thus far regarding the origin of the “genuine” crop circle formations and the methods utilized in order to create them is that both are presently unknown. Or pehaps better put: known only to the crea-tors, et al. So in the absence of an authentic, verifiable source, there can be no verifiable attribution. In a very large sense, determining what is genuine and what is counterfeit becomes a physical impossibility. Let’s go back to the dictionary for a moment, our best available resource of what words really mean. I didn’t cover everything in my previous definition of genuine, so now let’s go over a very important part I left out:

From Merriam-Webster —


b : actually produced by or proceeding from the alleged source or author: the signature is genuine

Contemplate this passage for a moment and you’ll begin to see where I’m coming from. How could you determine an authentic Stradavarius, or Picasso, or Rembrandt, without Stradavarius or Picasso or Rembrandt in the picture? In their absence, what artworks could be certified as genuinely attributable to them by any ways or means? It is only through comparing any item in question to certifiable examples from a verifiable source that we can render any valid judgment as to its authenticity. No verifiable source = no valid authen-ticity. 

The tacit — if not blatent — inference by cereologists is inevitably that only nonhuman &/or extraterrestrial intelligence could be responsible as the source of the “genuine” formations’ creation. But that is a theory, not a fact. It’s a hypothesis and nothing more. In the event that hypothesis were ever definitively proven false (a very real possibility), all  crop circles would consequently be categorized as hoaxes and their creators as hoaxers. Until then we can err on the side of Occham’s Razor, the investigative principle which suggests that the simplest and most plausible explanation is usually the best. And that leaves little big-head-ed reptilian humanoids from Zeta-Reticuli cleanly out of the mix.

A reasonable facsimile of one of the communicators used in the Star Trek episodes I used to watch as a kid is now nestled snugly in my shirt pocket. I just watched a documentary the other night where they were going over how the laser gun mounted on one of our latest aircraft works to shoot down missiles in mid-air. Yes boys & girls, we now have ray guns. We’ve repeatedly landed robots on Mars in order to send back images and scientific data. Scientists are now able to clone any living organism. For many years now we’ve had an electromagnetic pulse gun which will turn off the engine of any speeding automobile with the simple pull of a trigger. Why the police continue to refuse to use them to safely end car chases I’ll never know — I guess they just love driving fast and kicking ass. And in virtually every kitchen in virtually every home in this nation sits a modern-day wonder device which creates a cellular alteration of plant material akin to what scientists have been witnessing with the grains found within crop circle formations: it’s called the microwave. 

But that’s just the short list, obviously. And it doesn’t even enter into the realm of black-box projects and super-secret classified technology. Those guys are now working with an almost unlimited expense account, in deep underground military bases scattered all over the country, out of sight, out of mind. And they’ve been at it for decades.

And you’re telling me these guys can’t etch a pictogram into a grain field in such a way that would leave a whole lot of people scratching their heads and wondering over who did it and how it was done?

Please …


To close out the article we’ll address the false-flag element with two instructional videos, the first from William Cooper and the second featuring Dr. Carol Rosin, Cathy O’ Brien, and Nick Pope —