Archive for February, 2011

  Justice for this treachery doesn’t involve groping the genitals of small children in airports


“Those conspiracies that are too incredible to be believed, are by the same right, those which most often succeed.” — Marshall McLuhan


“The covert operators that I ran with would blow up a 747 with 300 people on it just to kill one person. They are total sociopaths with no conscience whatsoever.” — Former Pentagon CID Investigator Gene Wheaton


“If the people were to ever find out what we have done, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched.” — President George H.W. Bush, quoted by Sarah McClendon, Grand Dame of the White House Press Corp, in her June 1992 newsletter
“An evil cabal of soulless power-mongers has usurped your government through crimes of the highest magnitude and is busy working around the clock to make powerless, clueless slaves out of you. The truly pitiful part of it all is how willingly you believe in the hole-shot lies and how readily you accept the yoke, becoming ‘steaks on the table by choice and consent’ in the process.” John Dilligent 
JD’S TOP 9/11 Video Picks 
I have spent a considerable amount of time culling out what I believe to be “the best of the best” videos on the 9/11 terror attacks available on the net today, and have assembled them here in this one package. I have done this in the hopes of making this resource your “one-stop shopping center” for high-quality and authoritative footage, analysis, and discussion. It wasn’t easy, there are hundreds in existence, and some of my first choices were untenable for various reasons I won’t catalog here. But I can virtually guarantee you that if you’ve been straddling the fence on 9/11, spend a couple of hours digesting the content of these cherry-picked clips with an open mind, and you can come down off that fence once and for all.








Contains Content From: Music Shake















The most revolutionary products of human consciousness have never seen the light of day


A note about the videos:  If you can make it through the first mind-numbingly cheesy and substandard 5 minutes or so of Segment One of the following series, you won’t believe what happens next — you will be magically whisked away from the evil alternative dimen-sion we’ve allowed this world to become through the total domination of all mankind by the ruthless central bankers and global energy cartels, into a perfect world where we were running all our cars on tap water 30 years ago, getting 200 miles to the gallon of gasoline 60 years ago, and drawing all the free electricity we could ever want or need straight out of the atmosphere 100 years ago… and more.

It blows my mind straight out of the stratosphere when I hear people saying this techno-logy doesn’t exist — that if it did it would be in the marketplace and in use by the general public. I know that it does exist, and most of it existed before I was even born. A large part of it existed before my grandfather  was even born. I know because I’ve reviewed many of the patents, and the patent office will not issue a patent on anything under the sun that an inventor can’t prove works first through the provision of a fully functional model. And that’s a cold, hard fact. If any of these inventors received a patent on any of these inventions, they worked, believe it — or they never could have received a patent in the first place.

In Segment Three the producers of this video series provide an on-screen list of 927 such patents that you can research yourself in order to draw your own conclusions. And through-out the series, they not only provide footage of many of the prototypes in operation, but blow the lid off how and why these miraculous discoveries were effectively suppressed and their creators routinely stifled, often blackballed into destitution, and at least occasionally murdered.

There are 53 segments included in this series, repesenting 5 solid years of diligent research and analysis on the subject. The videos typically run 10 – 11 minutes on average. They are all different, but they tend to start out a little more biographical and in a more groundlay-ing mode, and then progress more into the technical analysis of working prototypes. The quality of the videos seems to progessively improve, too. I guess they just got better at it as they went along.

Needless to say I can’t include all 53. But I’ll throw up a few to get you started, then if you like what you see you can go to the source.

Fascinating, fascinating stuff. There is absolutely no valid reason why we’re still running our vehicles on expensive, poisonous, carbon monoxide-producing pump gas, other than the evil ruling elite’s stranglehold on alternative technology. We could have been filling our gas tanks with our garden hoses 30 years ago — and probably longer. Bob Lazar (of Area 51 fame) got his job at Los Alamos in the mid-eighties as a direct result of his having built a hydrogen-powered car that ran off tap water as a school science fair project. But the robber barons pulling the strings would lose trillions in the process, so they continue to keep this technology under wraps while they throw up shills that convince you it doesn’t exist or is still decades away in a practical sense… 

WARNING: If you do not want to spend the rest of your life feeling gypped every time you turn on a light and outraged every time you fill up your car — Do not watch this series! 













View the rest of this series and more at:


Have you asked yourself lately who you are, why you are here, and where you are going?


These questions have no right or wrong answers.

Because sometimes asking the right questions is  the answer…


How old would you be if you didn’t know how old you are?

Which is worse, failing or never trying?

If life is so short, why do we do so many things we don’t like and like so many things we don’t do?

When it’s all said and done, will you have said more than you’ve done?

What is the one thing you’d most like to change about the world?

If happiness was the national currency, what kind of work would make you rich?

Are you doing what you believe in, or are you settling for what you are doing?

If the average human life span was 40 years, how would you live your life differently?

To what degree have you actually controlled the course your life has taken?

Are you more worried about doing things right, or doing the right things?

You’re having lunch with three people you respect and admire. They all start criticizing a close friend of yours, not knowing she is your friend. The criticism is distasteful and unjustified. What do you do?

If you could offer a newborn child only one piece of advice, what would it be?

Would you break the law to save a loved one?

Have you ever seen insanity where you later saw creativity?

What’s something you know you do differently than most people?

How come the things that make you happy don’t make everyone happy?

What one thing have you not done that you really want to do? What’s holding you back?

Are you holding onto something you need to let go of?

If you had to move to a state or country besides the one you currently live in, where would you move and why?

Do you push the elevator button more than once? Do you really believe it makes the elevator faster?

Would you rather be a worried genius or a joyful simpleton?

Why are you, you?

Have you been the kind of friend you want as a friend?

Which is worse, when a good friend moves away, or losing touch with a good friend who lives right near you?

What are you most grateful for?

Would you rather lose all of your old memories, or never be able to make new ones?

Is is possible to know the truth without challenging it first?

Has your greatest fear ever come true?

Do you remember that time 5 years ago when you were extremely upset? Does it really matter now?

What is your happiest childhood memory? What makes it so special?

At what time in your recent past have you felt most passionate and alive?

If not now, then when?

If you haven’t achieved it yet, what do you have to lose?

Have you ever been with someone, said nothing, and walked away feeling like you just had the best conversation ever?

Why do religions that support love cause so many wars?

Is it possible to know, without a doubt, what is good and what is evil?

If you just won a million dollars, would you quit your job?

Would you rather have less work to do, or more work you actually enjoy doing?

Do you feel like you’ve lived this day a hundred times before?

When was the last time you marched into the dark with only the soft glow of an idea you strongly believed in?

If you knew that everyone you know was going to die tomorrow, who would you visit today?

Would you be willing to reduce your life expectancy by 10 years to become extremely attractive or famous?

What is the difference between being alive and truly living?

When is it time to stop calculating risk and rewards, and just go ahead and do what you know is right?

If we learn from our mistakes, why are we always so afraid to make a mistake?

What would you do differently if you knew nobody would judge you?

When was the last time you noticed the sound of your own breathing?

What do you love? Have any of your recent actions openly expressed this love?

In 5 years from now, will you remember what you did yesterday? What about the day before that? Or the day before that?

Decisions are being made right now. The question is: Are you making them for yourself, or are you letting others make them for you?


Courtesy of: Marc and Angel Hack Life

Located at:



Not much I feel I can add to this. Sometimes less is more. Alex puts the hammer down in this brief but informative and eye-opening expose’ on the impending American police state.




Okay, I had watched this particular video a few times and really liked it. The quality is good, the content is good, it does a good job of covering the Chilbolton and Crabwood Farm House crop circles, and it features an appearance by Paul Vigay, the cracker of the Crabwood disk code, who died not long afterward under mysterious circumstances.

I was deleting a lot of stuff that had accumulated on my favorites list when I stumbled across it again and decided to give it another viewing, thinking I might stick it somewhere on my site.

And that’s when it happened. After viewing this video I don’t know how many times and never catching it, this time something caught my eye around midscreen beginning at 3:14, as the producers were flying over the Crabwood “alien face” crop circle and shooting footage for the video. I watched as it moved to the right in a roughly horizontal trajectory and finally off the frame at 3:19. It is visible for 5 full seconds, travelling at a constant, moderate rate of speed.

To be a little more specific in terms of the UFO’s location within the frame: if you draw an imaginary line across your screen horizontally at the midpoint, and another one vertically at the midpoint in order to form four equal quadrants, you will be watching the upper right-hand quadrant. If you consider the top of your screen to be north, the bottom south, the right side east and the left side west, the UFO exits the treeline at the midpoint of the screen, pretty much where that white tower is located on the south side of the treeline. Then the UFO traverses the field where the crop circle is located, moving east-northeast, passing just to the right of that black pylon in the crop circle field and contining along a steady course and out of the frame.

Is this just the shadow on the ground of the airplane or the helicopter that the film crew is travelling in?  Judging from the shadows of the underlying ground obstructions, it is in about the right location. It is also moving in the same general direction, and travelling at around the same velocity. So that is surely the most plausible explanation.

There’s only one problem, however. If it’s simply a shadow, then why is it glowing? Where is all the luminescence coming from? In fact, when the “object” first enters the frame, all you see is the luminescence, but that is also coming from a darker field of view, or back-ground, so the aircraft’s shadow itself might tend to be inconspicuous at that point, leaving only the peripheral luminescence visible to the naked eye.

If the film crew’s aircraft were really shiny, say unpainted aluminum or pehaps metallic silver in color, with the sun behind it as it is throughout this sequence, would it result in a ground shadow that’s ringed by reflected light?

Honestly I don’t think I’ve seen that effect before, and I’m certainly no expert image ana-lyst, so I’m asking you: what do you think? We’ve got to have the fastest, easiest, most confidential comment-uploading system available on the web today. I tried it out myself to see what it was all about, and managed to get a comment up online in around 30 seconds or less, using only my initials as personal information — no sign-up, no log-in. no email adddress, no nothing…


Murder, mayhem, and mind control: it’s just another day at the office for this rogue outfit


“The most basic of all facts about brainwashing: In the entire history of man, no one has ever been brainwashed and realized, or believed, that he had been brainwashed.”Dick Sutphen, Author: The Battle For Your Mind


“It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction…Thus, it may be possible to ‘talk’ to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them.” — Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Defense Viewpoint, December, 1998


This is the first of a series of articles I intend to offer on the generic topic of mind control, if anything concerning mind control can be catalogued as generic. In this first piece we shall explore the origins and the basics of mind control, first with the Nazis during the rise and fall of the Third Reich, then continuing with the CIA’s experiments since Operation Paperclip and their acquistion of a large number of German mind-control specialists.

In subsequent articles we shall explore the remote placing of “thoughts” inside the heads
of unwitting victims who have not undergone formalized brainwashing techniques such as Monarch and Mk-Ultra trauma-based (disassociative) mind control programming; the possible involvement of mind control in the recent rash of school and workplace shootings; and last but not least, we shall investigate a hypothesis which posits that the alien abduc-tion phenomenon is actually a highly-advanced and ongoing, exclusively-terrestrial mind control program which began with the Betty and Barney Hill abduction and which will culminate with the exposition of phony, bio-engineered “aliens’ and an international false-flag attack, leading to the establishment of a socialist global empire and the New World Order. So stay tuned… 




A serious study of the moon reveals that virtually everything about it is anomalous


“Scientists at a meeting of the International Lunar Exploration Working Group argue that it doesn’t matter if humans have ‘been there’ — there is plenty we still don’t know about our moon…” — Joe Pappalardo, Popular Mechanics science writer


The moon is the only celestial body in the known universe besides the sun with which the Earth is inextricably bound. In fact, it has been hypothesized that life as we know it could never have evolved at all in the absence of the moon.

It also just happens to be the single most anomalous “player” in the solar system — the “odd ball”, so to speak. The truth is that its features, its orbit, its geological make-up, its planetary movement — virtually everything about it, in fact — defy the norm, and conspire to render it unequivocally unique among all known heavenly bodies.

Despite its “backyard proximity” in celestial terms and centuries of close examination and analysis, the finest minds on the planet still can’t even agree on how it may have gotten there, as the best available evidence concerning its very existence just doesn’t seem to add up to any viable conclusions.

The fact is, we’re no closer today than we were the day Gallileo trained the first little primitive telescope at the lunar surface for an historically closer view, in offering a rational explanation for how the moon came to be where it is, doing what it does.

But a seemingly irrational explanation has evolved along the way; outlandish on its face, there’s really only one monumentally grievous problem with it:

It fits.

It does, in fact, tend to rather tidily tie-up a host of anomalous loose-ends concerning the lunar mystery, offering up a plausible explanation (at least to the open-minded) for not only how  the moon arrived in its current physics-and-logic-defying orbit around our plan-et, but something infinitely more exciting to contemplate: Why. 

And the most beautiful thing about the theory, aside from its extreme romantic element, is that it is so thoroughly simple and straightforward, so completely uncomplicated, that even a caveman could grasp it. Simply put:

The moon is a spaceship.

What a wonderful suspenseful build-up and delivery that would have been if I hadn’t blown it in the title before you ever started in on the article!

According to the theory, at some unknown point in the dim past, some unknown extrater-restrial civilization either constructed “our” moon from scratch, or modified a conveniently available dead planet for use as a humongous spaceship — possibly big enough to carry the entire remnants of their dying or disaster-stricken population. Then, having outfitted the artificial satellite with an adequate propulsion system, and fuel and supplies enough for an extended journey, they boarded it and sailed it through the cosmos, until they encoun-tered a habitable planet and “parked” in close orbit around it. At that point, they may have ferried themselves to Earth in “space lifeboats”. We may in fact be the descendants of those space pioneers, or cosmic pilgrims… 

Actually the original theory doesn’t quite include all that, I kind of added to it as I went along. The original hypothesis simply posits that it was done and nothing more: who had done it, when, and for what reason was inconveniently left out of the theorem. The scenario outlined above is only one distinct possiblity.




The Spaceship Moon Theory, also known as the Vasin-Shcherbakov Theory, is a pseudoscientific theory that claims the Earth’s moon may actually be an alien spacecraft. The theory was put forth by two members of the former Soviet Academy of Sciences, Michael Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, in a July 1970 article entitled “Is the Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?”.

Vasin and Shcherbakov’s thesis was that the Moon is a hollowed-out planetoid created by unknown beings with technology far superior to any on Earth. Huge machines would have been used to melt rock and form large cavities within the Moon, with the resulting molten lava spewing out onto the Moon’s surface. The Moon would therefore consist of a hull-like inner shell and an outer shell made from metallic rocky slag. For reasons unknown, the “Spaceship Moon” was then placed into orbit around the Earth. (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.)




The Vasin-Shcherbakov Theory

Is The Moon The Creation Of Alien Intelligence?


Although people long ago began to wonder whether the “canals” on Mars were the crea-tion of cosmic engineers, for some odd reason it has not occurred to them to look with the same eyes upon the peculiarities of the lunar landscape much closer at hand. And all the arguments about the possibilities of intelligent life existing on other celestial bodies have been confined to the idea that other civilisations must necessarily live on the surface of a planet, and that the interior as a habitat is out of the question.

Abandoning the traditional paths of “common sense”, we have plunged into what may at first sight seem to be unbridled and irresponsible fantasy. But the more minutely we go into all the information gathered by man about the Moon, the more we are convinced that there is not a single fact to rule out our supposition. Not only that, but many things so far considered to be lunar enigmas are explainable in the light of this new hypothesis.


The origin of the Moon is one of the most complicated problems of cosmogony. So far there have been basically three hypotheses under discussion.

HYPOTHESIS I: The Moon was once a part of the Earth and broke away from it.

This has now been refuted by the evidence.

HYPOTHESIS II: The Moon was formed independently from the same cloud of dust and gas as the Earth, and immediately became the Earth’s natural satellite.

But then why is there such a big difference between the specific gravity of the Moon (3.33 grams per cubic centimeter) and that of the Earth (5.5 grams)? Furthermore, according to the latest information (analysis of samples brought back by the U.S. Apollo astronauts) lunar rock is not of the same composition as the Earth’s.

HYPOTHESIS III: The Moon came into being separately, and, moreover, far from the Earth (perhaps even outside the Solar system). This would mean that the moon would not have to be fashioned from the same “clay” as our own planet. Sailing through the Universe, the Moon came into Earth’s proximity, and by a complex interplay of forces of gravity was brought within a geocentric orbit, very close to circular. But a catch of this kind is virtually impossible.

In fact, scientists studying the origin of the Universe today have no acceptable theory to explain how the Earth-Moon system came into being.

OUR HYPOTHESIS: The Moon is an artificial Earth satellite put into orbit around the Earth by some intelligent beings unknown to ourselves.

We refuse to engage in speculation about who exactly staged this unique experiment, which only a highly developed civilisation was capable of.


If you are going to launch an artificial sputnik, then it is advisable to make it hollow. At the same time it would be naive to imagine that anyone capable of such a tremendous space project would be satisfied simply with some kind of giant empty trunk hurled into a near-Earth trajectory.

It is more likely that what we have here is a very ancient spaceship, the interior of which was filled with fuel for the engines, materials and appliances for repair work, navigation, instruments, observation equipment and all manner of machinery… in other words, every-thing necessary to enable this “caravelle of the Universe” to serve as a kind of Noah’s Ark

of intelligence, perhaps even as the home of a whole civilisation envisaging a prolonged (billions of years) existence and long wanderings through space (billions of miles).

Naturally, the hull of such a spaceship must be super-tough in order to stand up to the blows of meteorites and sharp fluctuations between extreme heat and extreme cold. Probably the shell is a double-layered affair — the basis a dense armouring of about 20 miles in thickness, and outside it some kind of more loosely-packed covering (a thinner layer, averaging about three miles). In certain areas — where the lunar “seas” and “craters” are, the upper layer is quite thin, in some cases, non-existent.

Since the Moon’s diameter is 2,162 miles, then looked at from our point of view it is a thin-walled sphere. And, understandably, not an empty one. There could be all kinds of mater-ials and equipment on its inner surface.

But the greatest proportion of the lunar mass is concentrated in the central part of the sphere, in its core, which has a diameter of 2,062 miles.

Thus the distance between the kernel and the shell of this nut is in the region of 30 miles. This space was doubtless filled with gases required for breathing, and for technological and other purposes.

With such an internal structure the Moon could have an average specific gravity of 3.3 grams per cubic centimeter, which differs considerably from that of Earth (5.5 grams per cubic centimeter).


The most numerous and interesting of the formations on the lunar surface are the craters. In diameter they vary considerably. Some are less that a yard across, while others are more than 120 miles (the biggest has a diameter of 148 miles). How does the Moon come to be so pockmarked?

There are two hypothesis–volcanic and meteoric. Most scientists vote for the latter.

Kirill Stanyukovich, a Soviet physicist, has written a whole series of works since 1937 in which he expounds the idea that the craters are the result of bombardment of the Moon for millions of years. And he really means bombardment, for even the smallest celestial body, when it is involved in one of those fastest head-on collisions so common in the cosmos behaves itself like a warhead charged with dynamite, or even an atomic warhead at times. Instant combustion takes place on impact, turning it into a dense cloud of incandescent gas, into plasma, and there is a very definite explosion.

According to Professor Stanykovich, a “missile” of a sizable character (say 6 miles in diameter) must, on collision with the Moon, penetrate to a depth equal to 4 or 5 times its own diameter (24-30 miles).

The surprising thing is that however big the meteorites may have been which have fallen on the Moon (some have been more than 60 miles in diameter), and however fast they must have been travelling (in some cases the combined speed was as much as 38 miles per second), the craters they have left behind are for some odd reason all about the same depth, 1.2-2 miles, although they vary tremendously in diameter.

Take that 148-mile diameter crater. In area it outdoes Hiroshima hundreds of times over. What a powerful explosion it must have been to send millions of tons of lunar rock fountaining over tens of miles! On the face of it, one would expect to find a very deep crater here, but nothing of the sort: there is three miles at the most between top and bottom levels, and one third of that is accounted for by the wall of rock thrown up around the crater like a toothed crown.

For such a big hole, it is too shallow. Furthermore, the bottom of the crater is convex, following the curve of the lunar surface. If you were to stand in the middle of the crater you would not even be able to see the soaring edge– it would be beyond the horizon. A hollow that is more like a hill is a rather strange affair, perhaps.

Not really, if one assumes that when the meteorite strikes the outer covering of the moon, this plays the role of a buffer and the foreign body finds itself up against an impenetrable spherical barrier. Only slightly denting the 20-mile layer of armour plating, the explosion flings bits of its “coating” far and wide.

Bearing in mind that the Moon’s defence coating is, according to our calculations, 2.5 miles thick, one sees that this is approximately the maximum depth of the craters.


Now let us consider the chemical peculiarities of the lunar rock. Upon analysis, American scientists have found chromium, titanium and zirconium in it. These are all metals with refractory, mechanically strong and anti-corrosive properties. A combination of them all would have envitable resistance to heat and the ability to stand up to means of aggression, and could be used on Earth for linings for electrical furnaces.

If a material had to be devised to protect a giant artificial satellite from the unfavorable effects of temperature, from cosmic radiation and meteorite bombardment, the experts would probably have hit on precisely these metals. In that case it is not clear why lunar rock is such an extraordinarily poor heat conductor–a factor which so amazed the astronauts? Wasn’t that what the designers of the Super-Sputnik of the Earth were after?

From the engineers point of view, this spaceship of ages long past which we call the Moon is superbly constructed. There may be a good reason for its extreme longevity. It is even possible that it predates our own planet. At any rate, some pieces of lunar rock have proved older than the oldest on Earth, although it is true, this applies to the age of the materials and not of the structure for which they were used. And from the number of craters on its surface, the Moon itself is no chicken.

It is, of course, difficult to say when it began to shine in the sky above the Earth, but on the basis of some preliminary estimates one might hazard a guess that it was around two thousand million years ago.

We do not, of course, imagine that the moon is still inhabited, and probably many of its automatic devices have stopped working, too. The stabilizers have ceased functioning and the poles have shifted. Even though the moon keeps that same side turned towards us, for some time it has been unsteady on its own axis, on occasion showing us part of its reverse side which were once invisible to observers on the Earth–for example, the Selenites themselves if they made expeditions here.

Time has taken its toll. Both body and rigging have disintegrated to some extent; some seams on the inner shell evidently diverged. We assume that the long (up to 940 miles) chains of small craters formerly ascribed to volcanic activity were brought about by eruptions of gas through cracks appearing in the armour plating as a result of accidents.

No doubt one of the most splendid features of the lunarscape–a straight “wall” nearly 500 yards high and over 60 miles long–formed as a result of one of the armour plates bending under the impact of celestial torpedoes and raising one of its straight, even edges.

The Moon’s population presumably took the necessary steps to remedy the effects of meteorite bombardment, for example, patching up rents in the outer shield covering the inner shell. For such purposes a substance from the lunar core was probably used, a kind a cement being made from it. After processing this would be piped to the surface sites where it was required.

Not long ago astronomers discovered variations in the gravitational fields near the large “seas”. We believe the reason to be this: the Moon’s dry seas are in fact areas from which the protective coating was torn from the armour cladding. To make good the damage to these vast tracts, the installation producing the repair substance would have had to be brought immediately beneath the site so that it could flood the area with “cement”. The resulting flat stretches are what look like seas to the terrestrial observer.

The stocks of materials and machinery for doing this are no doubt still where they were, and are sufficiently massive to give rise to these gravitational anomalies.

What is the Moon today? Is it a colossal necropolis, a “city of the dead,” where some form of life became extinct? Is it a kind cosmic Flying Dutchman?

A craft abandoned by its crew and controlled automatically? We do not know and we shall not try to guess.


We have put forward in this article only a few of the reasons–unfortunately the evidence is so far only circumstantial–for our hypothesis, which at first glance may appear to be crazy.

A similar “crazy” idea was put forward in 1959 by Professor Iosif Shklovsky, an eminent scientist, in relation to the “moons” circling around Mars. After carefully weighing up the evidence he concludes that they are both hollow and therefore artificial satellites.

We feel that the questions we have raised in connection with our Moon provide sufficient food for serious thought on the matter; the result may be the illumination of our many lunar riddles.

Now, of course, we have to wait for direct evidence to support our idea. Or refute it.

Probably there will not be long to wait.




You know, if you strive to remain open-minded while you closely analyze the lunar photos provided here I think you’ll have to admit the features just look “weird” — as in unnatural, atypical, anomalous, take your pick. The general terrain just looks too smooth and level, even at the bottoms of the larger craters, which incidently don’t look like any craters I’ve ever seen, possessing breadth but no real depth. Even the hills and mountains look as if they just “landed” there, possibly as ejecta from the meteor strikes.

NASA says the mares are the product of volcanic action, but if that’s true, then where are the volcanos? They’re not hard to spot on Earth, and we’ve even found some on Mars. But where are the volcanos that are supposed to be responsible for all that lava flow on the moon hiding? Shouldn’t they be at roughly the center of each mare, or at least somewhere nearby? But the truth is they are conspicuously inconspicuous, and what we have instead by all accounts including NASA’s, are mascons — roughly circular sub-surface areas of such extreme density that they create localized gravitational anomalies — located at or near the center of each and every mare. 

No one knows what these mascons are or what relationship they have to the lava flow. In fact, they remain a total enigma. If the “spaceship moon” theory really shines anywhere it may be here, as it offers up what may well be the most plausible, if not the only  plausible explanation: that they are the remnants of the monolithic sub-surface industrial complexes logically requisite for producing and pumping such an enormous volume of molten rock artificially. 

We certainly owe Vasin and Schcerbakov for their Erich von Danikenesque exploration of this theory, but since the initial publishing of their report much further work has been done, evidence compiled, and documentation accumulated on this subject; in fact, entire volumes have been written in support of their claims. Later we shall examine the current state of this research, but before we do, let’s hear what NASA feels we should know about our moon… 



The Moon is Earth’s nearest neighbor. It orbits the Earth at an average distance of approximately 240,000 miles (384,000 km). The Moon completes an orbit of the Earth every 27.3 days (approximately 655 hours). The Moon also rotates on its axis. Because of tidal forces, it completes one revolution every 655 hours. So one “side” of the Moon is always facing the Earth, and the other “side” is always facing away from the Earth. On the surface of the Moon, you would experience 327.5 hours of sunlight and 327.5 hours of darkness. If you lived on the side of the Moon facing the Earth, you would always see the Earth in the same location in the sky, although the stars and Sun would move across the sky. If you lived on the side of the Moon facing away from the Earth, you would never see the Earth, although you would see all the stars and the Sun.
At the time of its formation, the Moon had a liquid core and experienced flows of lava which created the flat basins, or “mares”, which we see from Earth. The Moon gradually cooled, forming a thick crust. We see no evidence of plate tectonics, as we have on Earth, so the surface material on the Moon has remained nearly the same for more than 3 billion years. Because of the lack of an atmosphere, the Moon’s surface has been bombarded by passing debris, creating many, many impact craters. The mass of the Moon is approxi-mately 8.1 x 10^19 tons (7.3 x 10^22 kg or .01 x Earth mass). The mean diameter of the Moon is 2,159 miles (3,476 km or .27 x Earth diameter). The mass of the Moon is not evenly distributed; mass concentrations, called Mascons, lie beneath many of the lunar basins, and the center of mass of the Moon is displaced several kilometers towards the Earth. The non-uniform mass distribution creates orbital stability problems for spacecraft orbiting the Moon.
The average surface gravitational acceleration (gmn) of the Moon is given by: gmn = 5.3 ft/sec^2 = 1.62 m/sec^2 = .165 Earth gravity
The Moon has no appreciable atmosphere. The sky is always black and the radiation from the Sun strikes with full force on the surface of the Moon. The lack of atmosphere produces temperature extremes on the Moon that range from -250 degrees F in the dark to +250 degrees F in the light. Because of the lack of atmosphere, and high radiation environment, there are no living organisms on the Moon. The lack of atmosphere means that there is no aerodynamic drag on a rocket leaving the surface of the Moon, but it also means that a landing spacecraft cannot use aerodynamic braking and must use rocket propulsion to land on the surface.
Robotic exploration of the Moon began in the early 1960′s by both the United States and the Soviet Union. Of particular note, the American Ranger spacecraft returned detailed pictures of the Moon as the spacecraft were crashed into the surface. The Ranger project was followed by the soft landing Surveyor spacecraft that performed a number of experiments on the lunar soil as well as photographic investigations from the surface. The Lunar Orbiter spacecraft produced photographic maps of the surface of the Moon that were used to select landing locations for the Apollo program. The Soviets also soft landed on the Moon as part of the Lunik (Luna) program. A lunar rover (Lunikhod) and a sample return mission were also successfully executed by the Soviet Union.
Human exploration of the Moon was begun by the United States during the Apollo program. Apollo 8 and Apollo 10 orbited the Moon without landing astronauts on the surface. Six Apollo missions (11, 12, 14, 15, 16, & 17) each landed two astronauts on the surface of the Moon. The last three missions included an electric-powered “buggy” which allowed the astronauts to explore several kilometers around the landing location. All of the missions returned lunar rocks and soil to the Earth and established research stations that continued to return data after the astronauts left the surface. Apollo 13 experienced an explosion on the way to the Moon. The spacecraft swung around the Moon and safely returned the crew to the Earth.
Strange Moon Facts 

1. Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.

2. Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.

3. Heavier Elements on Surface: Normal planetary composition results in heavier elements in the core and lighter materials at the surface; not so with the moon. According to Wilson, “The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced that several geologists proposed the refractory compounds were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They don’t know how, but that it was done cannot be questioned.”

4. Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles.

5. Magnetic Rocks: Moon rocks were magnetized. This is odd because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. This could not have originated from a “close call” with Earth—such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.

6. No Volcanoes: Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that the moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.

7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria, “are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident.”

8. Seismic Activity: Hundreds of “moonquakes” are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November, 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region. These observations have proved to be precisely identical and periodical, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to the Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.

9. Hollow Moon: The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, “If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.” Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is “simply a cavity.” MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, “the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field . . . indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow.” In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, “A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object.”

10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13 (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact the moon), with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light—or even no—core.

11. Unusual Metals: The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise! The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 “Blackbird”. Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, as were rustproof iron particles.

12. Moon’s Origin: Before the astronauts’ moon rocks conclusively disproved the theory, the moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago (who knows from where?). Another theory was that the moon was created from leftover “space dust” remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of moon rocks disproved this theory also. Another popular theory is that the moon was somehow “captured” by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov, stated, “It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible.”

13. Weird Orbit: Our moon is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth. “Something” had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.

14. Moon Diameter: How does one explain the “coincidence” that the moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds, “There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion.”

15. Spaceship Moon: As outrageous as the Moon-Is-a-Spaceship Theory is, all of the above items are resolved if one assumes that the moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings. This is the only theory that is supported by all of the data, and there are no data that contradict this theory.

Greek authors Aristotle and Plutarch, and Roman authors Apolllonius Rhodius and Ovid all wrote of a group of people called the Proselenes who lived in the central mountainous area of Greece called Arcadia The Proselenes claimed title to this area because their forebears were there “before there was a moon in the heavens.” This claim is substantiated by symbols on the wall of the Courtyard of Kalasasaya, near the city of Tiahuanaco, Bolivia, which record that the moon came into orbit around the Earth between 11,500 and 13, 000 years ago, long before recorded history.

1. Ages of Flashes: Aristarchus, Plato, Eratosthenes, Biela, Rabbi Levi, and Posidonius all reported anomalous lights on the moon. NASA, one year before the first lunar landing, reported 570+ lights and flashes were observed on the moon from 1540 to 1967.

2. Operation Moon Blink: NASA’s Operation Moon Blink detected 28 lunar events in a relatively short period of time.

3. Lunar Bridge: On July 29, 1953, John J. O’Neill observed a 12-mile-long bridge straddling the crater Mare Crisium. In August, British astronomer Dr. H.P. Wilkens verified its presence, “It looks artificial. It’s almost incredible that such a thing could have been formed in the first instance, or if it was formed, could have lasted during the ages in which the moon has been in existence.

4. The Shard: The Shard, an obelisk-shaped object that towers 1½ miles from the Ukert area of the moon’s surface, was discovered by Orbiter 3 in 1968. Dr. Bruce Cornet, who studied the amazing photographs, stated, “No known natural process can explain such a structure.”

5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.

6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall. “. . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids.”




Don Ecker, Mike Singh, NASA/JPL, The Forbidden Knowledge, Wikipedia, JAXA/NHK, and Ronald Regehr.


Some scientists believe that glyphs like these contain formulas for ET technology  


Okay, I hesitated to post up the following the following video series – a lecture / presen-tation by Maurice Osborn on the more technical aspects of crop circle analysis and the interpretation of scientific data that at least some of them are apparently transmitting — simply because the quality isn’t up to my usual standards for inclusion on this site. I have several problems with this “copy” of the presentation, chief among them the fact that the audio track lags behind the video in a most inconvenient way, particularly given the visual content.

But I had to do it anyway, because the content itself is the best I’ve ever seen so far in terms of the technical analysis of genuine crop circle formations and their scientific interpretation, although the series doesn’t start really heating up until you get into the second or third video. So stick with it, you’ll be glad you did.

Meanwhile, I’ll be searching for a better quality copy, and if and when I find one I’ll swap this one out for it. But don’t hold your breath, as this is a very obscure video and a better copy may not even exist. Until then, this one does get the job done, substandard quality aside…   









Our “State of Emergency”, Ongoing Since 1995:

What Does It Mean To You?

The United States is formally in an ongoing “state of emergency” which has been initiated, declared, maintained, and extended by our last few successive Chief Executive Officers. It was initially implemented on January 24, 1995 with the signing of Executive Order 12947 by President Bill Clinton. This “national emergency” was expanded in 1998 to include addi-tional targets such as Osama bin Laden, and was continued to 2008 by order of President George W. Bush, who declared an ongoing state of emergency on September 14, 2001 through Proclamation 7463, regarding the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Presi-dent Barack Obama extended George Bush’s Declaration of Emergency regarding terrorism on September 10, 2009, and again on September 10, 2010.

A “state of emergency” is a governmental declaration that may suspend normal functions
of the executive, legislative and judicial powers, alert citizens to change their normal beha-viors, or order government agencies to implement emergency preparedness plans. It can also be used as a rationale for suspending rights and freedoms, even if guaranteed under the constitution. Such declarations usually come during a time of natural or man-made dis-aster, a period of civil unrest, or following a declaration of war or situation of international or internal armed conflict.

An emergency declaration also allows the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to exercise its power to deal with emergency situations, and federal assistance becomes available to areas that are declared to be in a state of emergency. For FEMA, emergency declarations are different from the more common disaster declarations such as those imple-mented for hurricanes and floods. Typically, a state of emergency empowers the executive to name coordinating officials to deal with the situation and to override the normal proces-ses governing the passage of administrative rules. Rights and freedoms may be suspended during an emergency, for instance, freedom of movement.


 FEMA and REX 84

According to various sources, there may be over 800 internment camps in the US, all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by full time guards, but they are all empty. These camps are to be operated by FEMA should mar-tial law ever need to be implemented in the United States, and all it would take is a presi-dential signature on a proclamation, and the attorney general’s signature on a warrant to which a list of names is attached. Ask yourself if you really want to be on that list.

The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA. Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons.

Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub-programs which will be imple-mented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper purpose. Garden Plot is the program to control the population. Cable Splicer is the program for an orderly takeover of the state and local governments by the federal government. FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state and thus will head up all operations. The Presidential Executive Orders already listed on the Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for this operation.

The camps all have railroad tracks as well as roads leading to and from the detention facil-ities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority of the camps can house a population of 20,000 prisoners. Currently, the largest of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan facility is a massive mental health facility and can hold approximately two million people. Now let’s review the justification for any actions taken…


Executive Orders associated with FEMA would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years and could be en-acted by the stroke of a Presidential pen:

allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998                                                                                allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways.

allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government super-vision.

allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for popula-tions.

allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facili-ties.

specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and econo-mic or financial crisis.

grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the Pres-ident.

assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolida-ting 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.

allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institutions in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation. General Frank Salzedo, chief of FEMA’s Civil Security Division stated in a 1983 conference that he saw FEMA’s role as a “new frontier in the protection of individual and governmental leaders from assassination, and of civil and military installations from sabotage and/or attack, as well as prevention of dissident groups from gaining access to U.S. opinion, or a global audience in times of crisis.” FEMA’s powers were consolidated by President Carter to incorporate the:

National Security Act of 1947
allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities.

1950 Defense Production Act
gives the President sweeping powers over all aspects of the economy.

Act of August 29, 1916
authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in time of war, to take possession of any transpor-tation system for transporting troops, material, or any other purpose related to the emer-gency.

International Emergency Economic Powers Act
enables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or national. These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979.









“This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill — the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill — you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes…”

                                                                  Morpheus, from The Matrix


“If there’s a blue pill and a red pill, and the blue pill is half the price of the red pill and works just as well, why not pay half price for the thing that’s going to make you feel better?